-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Add security rules for detecting hard-coded secrets in Python applications #89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Sakshis seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account. You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it. |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces multiple new security rules for Python applications, focusing on the detection of hard-coded secrets and improper authentication practices in MySQL and Neo4j database connections. The changes include the addition of YAML configuration files defining these rules, which are categorized under a warning severity level. Test cases and snapshot files are also created to validate and demonstrate various connection scenarios, both secure and insecure, ensuring adherence to security best practices. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
tests/python/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python-test.yml (1)
8-33
: Consider adding more test cases for environment variables.While the invalid test cases cover various ways of hardcoding passwords, consider adding test cases that demonstrate the recommended approach using environment variables (e.g.,
os.getenv('DB_PASSWORD')
).Example of a recommended test case:
valid: - | from MySQLdb import _mysql as mysql import os db = mysql.connect( host=FLAGS.host, user=FLAGS.user, passwd=os.getenv('DB_PASSWORD'), db=FLAGS.db )rules/python/security/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python.yml (1)
12-240
: Consider enhancing the rule patterns.The rule effectively catches hardcoded passwords but could be improved to:
- Detect string concatenation in passwords (e.g.,
"pass" + "word"
)- Recognize more string patterns (e.g., f-strings, raw strings)
rules/python/security/python-neo4j-empty-password-python.yml (1)
12-98
: Consider enhancing the rule to catch more edge cases.While the current implementation effectively catches empty string literals, it might miss some edge cases:
- String concatenation resulting in empty strings
- Empty strings passed through variables
- Empty strings from environment variables
Consider extending the rule to handle these cases. Would you like me to provide examples of these patterns to help expand the rule coverage?
tests/python/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python-test.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-98
: Architectural Recommendation: Consider a shared test utilities module.Given that both test files share similar patterns and structures, consider:
- Creating a shared test utilities module to maintain consistency
- Implementing helper functions for common test patterns
- Adding documentation about the expected structure of valid/invalid test cases
This would help prevent issues like the reversed test sections and make the test suite more maintainable.
Would you like me to provide an example structure for this shared test utilities module?
rules/python/security/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python.yml (1)
12-104
: Consider enhancing the string pattern matching.While the rule effectively detects hard-coded secrets, it could be improved to handle more edge cases.
Consider adding these patterns to the rule:
rule: kind: call any: - all: - has: nthChild: 1 kind: identifier value: function any: - regex: ^(kerberos_auth|bearer_auth)$ + - regex: ^(Auth\.kerberos|Auth\.bearer)$ # Handle Auth class methods - pattern: $ALIAS1
tests/__snapshots__/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python-snapshot.yml (1)
4-298
: Consider using a more complex password in test cases.Using "password" as the test password might not effectively demonstrate the detection of real-world hardcoded secrets.
Consider using a more realistic password pattern like "MyS3cret!P@ssw0rd" to better represent actual hardcoded secrets in production code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
rules/python/security/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python.yml
(1 hunks)rules/python/security/python-neo4j-empty-password-python.yml
(1 hunks)rules/python/security/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python.yml
(1 hunks)tests/__snapshots__/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python-snapshot.yml
(1 hunks)tests/__snapshots__/python-neo4j-empty-password-python-snapshot.yml
(1 hunks)tests/__snapshots__/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python-snapshot.yml
(1 hunks)tests/python/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python-test.yml
(1 hunks)tests/python/python-neo4j-empty-password-python-test.yml
(1 hunks)tests/python/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python-test.yml
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
tests/python/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python-test.yml (1)
2-7
: LGTM! Valid test case demonstrates secure practice.
The valid test case correctly demonstrates the secure practice of not hardcoding passwords in the connection string.
rules/python/security/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python.yml (1)
1-10
: LGTM! Well-documented security rule with proper references.
The rule includes:
- Clear message explaining the security risk
- References to CWE-798 and OWASP A07:2021
- Link to OWASP Secrets Management Cheat Sheet
tests/__snapshots__/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python-snapshot.yml (1)
1-378
: LGTM! Snapshots match test cases.
The snapshot file correctly captures all test cases with appropriate style information for highlighting matches.
rules/python/security/python-neo4j-empty-password-python.yml (1)
4-10
: LGTM! Well-documented security guidance.
The message and documentation section is comprehensive, including:
- Clear explanation of the security risk
- Concrete mitigation strategies
- Relevant CWE and OWASP references
rules/python/security/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python.yml (1)
1-11
: LGTM! Well-structured security rule with comprehensive guidance.
The rule metadata is well-defined with:
- Clear explanation of the security risk
- Proper reference to CWE-798 and OWASP guidelines
- Actionable mitigation guidance suggesting environment variables and secure vaults
tests/__snapshots__/python-neo4j-empty-password-python-snapshot.yml (1)
1-318
: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for empty password scenarios.
The snapshots effectively cover:
- All Neo4j authentication methods (basic, custom, bearer, kerberos)
- Both direct and aliased import scenarios
- Proper source highlighting for error detection
tests/__snapshots__/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python-snapshot.yml (1)
1-350
: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for hardcoded password scenarios.
The snapshots effectively cover:
- All Neo4j authentication methods (basic, custom, bearer, kerberos)
- Both direct and aliased import scenarios
- Proper source highlighting for error detection
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Tests
These updates enhance the security and testing capabilities of Python applications, ensuring better practices in credential management.