Skip to content

Add security rules for detecting hard-coded secrets in Python applications #89

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ESS-ENN
Copy link
Collaborator

@ESS-ENN ESS-ENN commented Dec 6, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced security rules for detecting hard-coded secrets in MySQL and Neo4j database connections.
    • Added rules to flag empty passwords in Neo4j authentication.
  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive test cases for MySQL and Neo4j authentication scenarios, including valid and invalid uses of credentials.
    • New snapshot files created to illustrate different connection methods and authentication strategies.

These updates enhance the security and testing capabilities of Python applications, ensuring better practices in credential management.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


Sakshis seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces multiple new security rules for Python applications, focusing on the detection of hard-coded secrets and improper authentication practices in MySQL and Neo4j database connections. The changes include the addition of YAML configuration files defining these rules, which are categorized under a warning severity level. Test cases and snapshot files are also created to validate and demonstrate various connection scenarios, both secure and insecure, ensuring adherence to security best practices.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rules/python/security/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python.yml Added a rule to detect hard-coded secrets in MySQL connections.
rules/python/security/python-neo4j-empty-password-python.yml Introduced a rule to warn against empty passwords in Neo4j database connections.
rules/python/security/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python.yml Added a rule for detecting hard-coded secrets in Neo4j authentication methods.
tests/__snapshots__/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python-snapshot.yml Created a snapshot for testing MySQL connection scenarios, highlighting hard-coded secrets.
tests/__snapshots__/python-neo4j-empty-password-python-snapshot.yml Introduced a snapshot for testing Neo4j authentication methods, focusing on empty passwords.
tests/__snapshots__/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python-snapshot.yml Added a snapshot for testing Neo4j authentication methods with hard-coded secrets.
tests/python/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python-test.yml Created test cases for validating MySQL connections, focusing on the presence of hard-coded secrets.
tests/python/python-neo4j-empty-password-python-test.yml Introduced test cases for Neo4j authentication, validating both valid and empty password scenarios.
tests/python/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python-test.yml Added test cases for Neo4j authentication methods, distinguishing between valid and invalid scenarios.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • harjotgill

🐇 "In the code where secrets hide,
A rule now stands, our trusty guide.
With tests and snapshots, we ensure,
That hard-coded secrets find no cure.
For safety's sake, let’s store with care,
In vaults and vars, our secrets rare!" 🐇


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title @coderabbitai Add security rules for detecting hard-coded secrets in Python applications Dec 6, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
tests/python/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python-test.yml (1)

8-33: Consider adding more test cases for environment variables.

While the invalid test cases cover various ways of hardcoding passwords, consider adding test cases that demonstrate the recommended approach using environment variables (e.g., os.getenv('DB_PASSWORD')).

Example of a recommended test case:

valid:
  - |
    from MySQLdb import _mysql as mysql
    import os
    db = mysql.connect(
      host=FLAGS.host, user=FLAGS.user, passwd=os.getenv('DB_PASSWORD'), db=FLAGS.db
    )
rules/python/security/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python.yml (1)

12-240: Consider enhancing the rule patterns.

The rule effectively catches hardcoded passwords but could be improved to:

  1. Detect string concatenation in passwords (e.g., "pass" + "word")
  2. Recognize more string patterns (e.g., f-strings, raw strings)
rules/python/security/python-neo4j-empty-password-python.yml (1)

12-98: Consider enhancing the rule to catch more edge cases.

While the current implementation effectively catches empty string literals, it might miss some edge cases:

  1. String concatenation resulting in empty strings
  2. Empty strings passed through variables
  3. Empty strings from environment variables

Consider extending the rule to handle these cases. Would you like me to provide examples of these patterns to help expand the rule coverage?

tests/python/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python-test.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-98: Architectural Recommendation: Consider a shared test utilities module.

Given that both test files share similar patterns and structures, consider:

  1. Creating a shared test utilities module to maintain consistency
  2. Implementing helper functions for common test patterns
  3. Adding documentation about the expected structure of valid/invalid test cases

This would help prevent issues like the reversed test sections and make the test suite more maintainable.

Would you like me to provide an example structure for this shared test utilities module?

rules/python/security/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python.yml (1)

12-104: Consider enhancing the string pattern matching.

While the rule effectively detects hard-coded secrets, it could be improved to handle more edge cases.

Consider adding these patterns to the rule:

 rule:
   kind: call
   any:
     - all:
         - has:
             nthChild: 1
             kind: identifier
             value: function
             any:
               - regex: ^(kerberos_auth|bearer_auth)$
+              - regex: ^(Auth\.kerberos|Auth\.bearer)$  # Handle Auth class methods
               - pattern: $ALIAS1
tests/__snapshots__/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python-snapshot.yml (1)

4-298: Consider using a more complex password in test cases.

Using "password" as the test password might not effectively demonstrate the detection of real-world hardcoded secrets.

Consider using a more realistic password pattern like "MyS3cret!P@ssw0rd" to better represent actual hardcoded secrets in production code.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2f95a8e and a57646f.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • rules/python/security/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python.yml (1 hunks)
  • rules/python/security/python-neo4j-empty-password-python.yml (1 hunks)
  • rules/python/security/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/__snapshots__/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python-snapshot.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/__snapshots__/python-neo4j-empty-password-python-snapshot.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/__snapshots__/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python-snapshot.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/python/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python-test.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/python/python-neo4j-empty-password-python-test.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/python/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python-test.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
tests/python/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python-test.yml (1)

2-7: LGTM! Valid test case demonstrates secure practice.

The valid test case correctly demonstrates the secure practice of not hardcoding passwords in the connection string.

rules/python/security/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python.yml (1)

1-10: LGTM! Well-documented security rule with proper references.

The rule includes:

  • Clear message explaining the security risk
  • References to CWE-798 and OWASP A07:2021
  • Link to OWASP Secrets Management Cheat Sheet
tests/__snapshots__/python-mysqlclient-hardcoded-secret-python-snapshot.yml (1)

1-378: LGTM! Snapshots match test cases.

The snapshot file correctly captures all test cases with appropriate style information for highlighting matches.

rules/python/security/python-neo4j-empty-password-python.yml (1)

4-10: LGTM! Well-documented security guidance.

The message and documentation section is comprehensive, including:

  • Clear explanation of the security risk
  • Concrete mitigation strategies
  • Relevant CWE and OWASP references
rules/python/security/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python.yml (1)

1-11: LGTM! Well-structured security rule with comprehensive guidance.

The rule metadata is well-defined with:

  • Clear explanation of the security risk
  • Proper reference to CWE-798 and OWASP guidelines
  • Actionable mitigation guidance suggesting environment variables and secure vaults
tests/__snapshots__/python-neo4j-empty-password-python-snapshot.yml (1)

1-318: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for empty password scenarios.

The snapshots effectively cover:

  • All Neo4j authentication methods (basic, custom, bearer, kerberos)
  • Both direct and aliased import scenarios
  • Proper source highlighting for error detection
tests/__snapshots__/python-neo4j-hardcoded-secret-auth-python-snapshot.yml (1)

1-350: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for hardcoded password scenarios.

The snapshots effectively cover:

  • All Neo4j authentication methods (basic, custom, bearer, kerberos)
  • Both direct and aliased import scenarios
  • Proper source highlighting for error detection

@ESS-ENN ESS-ENN closed this Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants