Skip to content

fix: update publish_dir to fix online docs #207

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

shenxianpeng
Copy link
Contributor

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng commented Jan 2, 2025

  • fix online docs
  • update os to ubuntu-24.04 to fix warning
  • update pip to the latest version to fix the warning on MacOS with Python3.8

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow to use Ubuntu 24.04
    • Updated Gitpod configuration to upgrade pip before installing dependencies
    • Updated project configuration to require Python 3.8+ and add PyYAML dependency

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces configuration updates across multiple files to improve project setup and dependency management. The changes focus on updating the GitHub Actions workflow to use Ubuntu 24.04, enhancing the Gitpod setup by upgrading pip, and modifying the project's metadata in pyproject.toml to specify Python version compatibility and add a new dependency (pyyaml).

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/main.yml - Updated OS to ubuntu-24.04
- Added pip upgrade before installing dev requirements
- Modified documentation upload path
.gitpod.yml - Added pip upgrade step before installing dependencies
pyproject.toml - Added Python version requirement (>=3.8)
- Added pyyaml as a project dependency

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Workflow Rhyme 🚀

Pip upgraded, dependencies neat,
Ubuntu's latest, a technological treat
Python 3.8 and YAML in sight
Our project's config is looking just right!

Hop hop hooray! 🎉


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b1cd769 and b09c190.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/main.yml (2 hunks)
  • .gitpod.yml (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/main.yml (3)

57-57: LGTM: Explicit Ubuntu version.

Using a specific Ubuntu version (24.04) instead of 'latest' improves CI stability and reproducibility.


64-66: LGTM: Pip upgrade step added.

Adding an explicit pip upgrade step before installing requirements is a good practice and addresses the MacOS warning mentioned in the PR objectives.


105-105: Verify the docs build path.

The publish_dir path has been changed from ./docs/_build/html to ./_build/html. Let's verify this aligns with the actual build output location.

✅ Verification successful

The publish_dir path change is correct and aligns with the build output

The verification confirms that the docs are being built to ./_build/html:

  • The nox docs session shows sphinx-build outputs to _build/html
  • The nox docs-live session also uses _build/html as the output directory
  • The sphinx configuration excludes _build directory, indicating it's at the root level
  • No references to the old path ./docs/_build/html were found
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the docs are actually being built in the new location
# and if the old location is still being used

# Check the nox docs session configuration
rg -A 5 "docs" noxfile.py

# Check if there are any references to the old path
rg "./docs/_build/html"

# Check sphinx configuration for output path
fd -g "conf.py" -x cat {} \; | rg -i "build|output"

Length of output: 1155

pyproject.toml (1)

14-15: LGTM: Python version requirement and dependency addition.

The changes look good:

  • The Python version requirement (>=3.8) matches the supported versions in classifiers
  • The addition of pyyaml as a dependency is properly declared

However, let's verify if pyyaml is actually used in the project.

✅ Verification successful

PyYAML dependency is correctly added and utilized in the codebase

The verification confirms that the PyYAML dependency is actively used in the project:

  • commit_check/util.py imports and uses the yaml module
  • The yaml functionality is also referenced in its corresponding test file tests/util_test.py

Let's check the actual usage to ensure it's a required dependency:


PyYAML dependency is properly used for configuration file handling

The verification confirms that PyYAML is correctly used in the codebase:

  • commit_check/util.py uses yaml.safe_load() to parse configuration files
  • tests/util_test.py contains corresponding test cases that verify the YAML parsing functionality
  • The usage of yaml.safe_load() indicates proper security practices for YAML parsing
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for yaml/yml usage in the project
rg -l "yaml\." 

# Check for yaml imports
ast-grep --pattern 'import yaml'
ast-grep --pattern 'from yaml import'

Length of output: 166


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual yaml usage in the files
rg "yaml\." -A 2 commit_check/util.py tests/util_test.py

Length of output: 767

.gitpod.yml (1)

6-6: LGTM: Consistent pip upgrade step.

The addition of the pip upgrade step is consistent with the changes in the workflow file and addresses the pip version warning mentioned in the PR objectives.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 2, 2025

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 2, 2025

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.27%. Comparing base (b1cd769) to head (b09c190).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #207   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.27%   97.27%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         294      294           
=======================================
  Hits          286      286           
  Misses          8        8           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng merged commit c8602e5 into main Jan 2, 2025
26 checks passed
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng deleted the bugfix/update-docs-site branch January 2, 2025 12:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants