-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 281
doc(#318): add documentation about WinError 995 #431
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other than the minor documentation reword. Everything looks good. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, sorry for the late review. As PyCon TW approaches, I get less time to devote to this project. Here are some errors I found on the changes.
You could test out through
poetry run mkdocs build
poetry run mkdocs serve
Would be great if you could add these commands to "how to contribute" so that others can have a better idea on how to test documentation changes
Also, you might need to rebase the latest master branch into this branch to pass the test fail |
So now we have a single place to view all the FAQs.
Provide the accurate versions that should solve this issue.
According to mkdoc documentation, link to another page in the same documentation can directly use file path. mkdoc documentation: https://www.mkdocs.org/user-guide/writing-your-docs/#linking-to-pages
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #431 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 97.92% 97.37% -0.55%
==========================================
Files 39 39
Lines 1395 1409 +14
==========================================
+ Hits 1366 1372 +6
- Misses 29 37 +8
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@Lee-W sorry for lately fix and thank you for helping me to rebase the upstream. I have finished those changes. |
These reference-style links should in `[link][id]` format instead of `[link](id)`.
@Bogay hmmm... that's weird. sometimes codecov just acts weird. never mind, let's merge it |
Description
Add some description related to #318 so that others may find the solution on documentation.
Checklist
./script/format
and./script/test
locally to ensure this change passes linter check and testExpected behavior
Steps to Test This Pull Request
Additional context