[meta.unary.prop] [class.default.ctor] [class.dtor] Indexing and xrefs for the word "trivial" #6997
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jensmaurer
approved these changes
May 14, 2024
|
To be fair, [special] also says nothing about the word "trivial"; perhaps that crossref should also be removed. Which would make it a little clearer that the notions of "trivial function call" and "trivial operation" aren't defined anywhere. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The definition of "trivial type" isn't relevant to the notion of "non-trivial function" (which isn't really defined anywhere, I'm finding).
We have a bogus index entry for "non-trivial constructor" (should have been "non-trivial default constructor," which already exists), and lack an entry (and
\defnxitalicization) for "trivial destructor".FWIW I checked that P3247 "Deprecate the notion of trivial types" didn't already touch either of these; I think this cleanup is pretty orthogonal to P3247.