Skip to content

Conversation

eisenwave
Copy link
Member

As discussed in #7843, there are certain uses of "suitably X" which aren't as clear as they should be. We use "suitably aligned" in a number of places, but that is not a formal term, and it is not in the index.

To clarify these uses of the term, this PR adds an \indextext{suitably aligned}, adds references to [basic.align] in [obj.lifetime], and rewords parts of [new.delete].

The last of these is the biggest change. The original wording is

Return a non-null pointer to suitably aligned storage\iref{basic.stc.dynamic}

This is confusing because it looks like "suitably aligned storage" is a defined term which would be found in [basic.stdc.dynamic]. In reality, it's not a defined term, and there are merely some rules more specifically found in [basic.stc.dynamic.allocation].

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant