Skip to content

feat: capture and output clang version used #124

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 5, 2024
Merged

feat: capture and output clang version used #124

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 5, 2024

Conversation

2bndy5
Copy link
Contributor

@2bndy5 2bndy5 commented Oct 4, 2024

This idea was brought up in discussion #123

Shows the clang tools' version number which was used to the generated the feedback.
Affects thread-comments, step-summary, and PR review summary.

I also fixed some errors that I noticed when verifying test results:

  1. filtering files per tool was not working because the file filters were assigned backwards; ignore-tidy was used for clang-format and ignore-format was used for clang-tidy.
  2. merging suggestions in PR review was not checking that the file name was an exact match. This really only affected our tests because the demo.cpp file is copied twice into the test workspace (once as a .cpp file and again as a .c file).
  3. A PR review summary would state that nothing was reported from a tool that was not set to provide PR review suggestions.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Enhanced feedback mechanism now includes clang tool version information in comments and reports.
    • New class ClangVersions added to encapsulate version details for clang tools.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved suggestion handling to ensure correct association with respective files.
    • Adjusted logic for merging similar suggestions based on file names.
    • Streamlined handling of tidy checks in the review process.
  • Documentation

    • Updated tests to reflect changes in clang output handling and feedback posting processes.
  • Chores

    • Refactored various methods to accommodate new parameters for clang versions, improving overall clarity and functionality.

@2bndy5 2bndy5 added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 4, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (89361f0) to head (ddb10c8).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #124      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   99.88%   100.00%   +0.11%     
===========================================
  Files          24        24              
  Lines        1798      1826      +28     
===========================================
+ Hits         1796      1826      +30     
+ Misses          2         0       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

2bndy5 added 2 commits October 4, 2024 18:38
also fix some errors:
1. about filter files per clang tool
2. merged suggestions' file name must match exactly
when tool was not used at all OR review was not requested from a particular tool
@2bndy5 2bndy5 marked this pull request as ready for review October 5, 2024 05:16
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve significant updates across multiple files in the cpp_linter package, primarily focusing on enhancing the handling of clang tool outputs and integrating version information. Key modifications include the introduction of a new ClangVersions class, updates to various method signatures to accept clang version parameters, and improvements in the logic for processing feedback and suggestions. The tests have also been adjusted to accommodate these changes, ensuring that the new functionality is correctly validated.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
cpp_linter/__init__.py Updated main() function to assign clang tool outputs to clang_versions and modified post_feedback to include this new parameter.
cpp_linter/clang_tools/__init__.py Added VERSION_PATTERN regex, _capture_tool_version method, and ClangVersions class. Modified capture_clang_tools_output to return ClangVersions instance.
cpp_linter/clang_tools/clang_tidy.py Enhanced TidyAdvice class with a check in _has_related_suggestion and added logic for handling notifications without applied fixes. Updated run_clang_tidy for command clarity.
cpp_linter/clang_tools/patcher.py Changed tool_total to allow None values, updated merge_similar_suggestion method, and modified serialize_to_github_payload to accept tidy_version and format_version.
cpp_linter/rest_api/__init__.py Updated RestApiClient methods to include clang_versions parameter for generating comments and posting feedback.
cpp_linter/rest_api/github_api.py Modified GithubApiClient methods to accept clang_versions, enabling the integration of version information into feedback and review processes.
tests/capture_tools_output/test_database_path.py Updated test to capture clang_versions from capture_clang_tools_output and pass it to GithubApiClient.make_comment.
tests/test_comment_length.py Added ClangVersions import and instantiated it in test_comment_length_limit, passing it to GithubApiClient.make_comment.

Poem

In the garden of code, where clang tools play,
Versions now dance, in a bright, new way.
With feedback enriched, and suggestions aligned,
Our linter hops forward, leaving worries behind.
So let’s cheer for the changes, both bold and bright,
For a cleaner, clearer code, oh what a delight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
tests/test_comment_length.py (2)

19-20: Consider using a more realistic version string.

While the current implementation works, using a placeholder version "x.y.z" might not fully represent real-world scenarios. Consider using a more realistic version string (e.g., "10.0.0") to ensure the test covers actual use cases.

 versions = ClangVersions()
-versions.format = "x.y.z"
+versions.format = "10.0.0"

26-26: LGTM: Clang versions parameter added correctly.

The clang_versions parameter has been consistently added to both make_comment calls, which aligns with the PR objective to display the clang version used in the output.

Consider renaming the versions variable to clang_versions for clarity:

-versions = ClangVersions()
-versions.format = "x.y.z"
+clang_versions = ClangVersions()
+clang_versions.format = "x.y.z"

 thread_comment = GithubApiClient.make_comment(
     files=files,
     format_checks_failed=format_checks_failed,
     tidy_checks_failed=0,
-    clang_versions=versions,
+    clang_versions=clang_versions,
     len_limit=abs_limit,
 )

 step_summary = GithubApiClient.make_comment(
     files=files,
     format_checks_failed=format_checks_failed,
     tidy_checks_failed=0,
-    clang_versions=versions,
+    clang_versions=clang_versions,
     len_limit=None,
 )

Also applies to: 35-35

cpp_linter/__init__.py (1)

81-81: LGTM: Outputting clang versions in feedback

The change correctly passes the captured clang versions to the post_feedback method, ensuring that this information will be included in the feedback. This modification aligns well with the PR objective of displaying the clang version used in thread comments, step summaries, and PR review summaries.

Consider updating the docstring of the post_feedback method to reflect the new clang_versions parameter. This will help maintain clear documentation for future developers.

tests/capture_tools_output/test_database_path.py (2)

99-99: Consider adding type annotation for clang_versions

To improve code clarity and catch potential type-related issues early, consider adding a type annotation for the clang_versions variable. Based on the AI-generated summary, it seems that capture_clang_tools_output now returns a List[str].

You could update the line as follows:

clang_versions: List[str] = capture_clang_tools_output(files, args=args)

Don't forget to import List from typing if it's not already imported.


Line range hint 99-115: Consider adding an assertion for clang_versions

To ensure that the capture_clang_tools_output function is correctly returning the clang version information, it would be beneficial to add an assertion that checks the content of clang_versions.

You could add an assertion like this after line 99:

assert clang_versions, "Clang versions should not be empty"
assert all(isinstance(version, str) for version in clang_versions), "All clang versions should be strings"

This will verify that clang_versions is not empty and contains only string values.

tests/comments/test_comments.py (3)

69-69: LGTM! Consider addressing file filtering issues.

The changes correctly implement the capture and passing of clang tool versions, which aligns with the PR objective. The test structure remains valid, ensuring that the new functionality is properly tested.

However, the PR objectives mention addressing errors in file filtering (ignore-tidy and ignore-format). Consider adding or modifying tests to cover these scenarios as well.

Would you like assistance in creating additional test cases for the file filtering functionality?

Also applies to: 172-172


Line range hint 1-172: Consider adding tests for suggestion merging issue.

The PR objectives mention an issue with merging suggestions in PR reviews, particularly affecting tests due to the duplication of the demo.cpp file. It would be beneficial to add test cases that cover this scenario to ensure the fix is properly implemented and to prevent regression.

Would you like assistance in drafting test cases for the suggestion merging functionality?


Line range hint 1-172: Summary: Changes look good, consider addressing additional PR objectives.

The implemented changes correctly capture and use the clang tool versions, which is a key objective of this PR. The test structure remains robust and valid.

To fully address all PR objectives:

  1. Add tests for the file filtering functionality (ignore-tidy and ignore-format).
  2. Implement tests for the suggestion merging issue, particularly for cases with duplicated files.
  3. Consider adding a test to verify that the PR review summary correctly reports tool output, addressing the mentioned inaccuracy.

These additions will ensure comprehensive coverage of all the changes mentioned in the PR objectives.

Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggested test cases or modifications?

tests/capture_tools_output/test_tools_output.py (2)

70-72: LGTM with suggestion: ClangVersions integration

The addition of the ClangVersions object and its usage in the make_comment function aligns with the PR objective. However, setting both format and tidy versions to "x.y.z" seems to be a placeholder.

Consider updating these placeholders with actual version information or a method to dynamically fetch the correct versions.

Also applies to: 77-77


Line range hint 1-1: Suggestion: Add tests for clang version output

While the changes align with the PR objective of capturing and outputting clang version information, I noticed that no new tests were added specifically for this functionality.

Consider adding new test cases to verify the correct capture and output of clang version information. This will ensure the new feature is working as expected and prevent potential regressions in the future.

cpp_linter/clang_tools/__init__.py (1)

85-86: Simplify subprocess output handling with text=True

By setting text=True in the subprocess.run call, the output will be returned as a string, eliminating the need to decode stdout manually.

Apply this diff:

-version_out = subprocess.run([cmd, "--version"], capture_output=True, check=True)
-output = version_out.stdout.decode()
+version_out = subprocess.run([cmd, "--version"], capture_output=True, check=True, text=True)
+output = version_out.stdout
cpp_linter/rest_api/__init__.py (1)

181-181: Ensure Docstring Consistency with Method Parameters.

The docstring now includes the :param clang_versions: description. Confirm that the docstring accurately reflects the method's parameters and usage.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 89361f0 and 4d67d41.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • cpp_linter/init.py (1 hunks)
  • cpp_linter/clang_tools/init.py (3 hunks)
  • cpp_linter/clang_tools/clang_tidy.py (1 hunks)
  • cpp_linter/clang_tools/patcher.py (6 hunks)
  • cpp_linter/rest_api/init.py (7 hunks)
  • cpp_linter/rest_api/github_api.py (8 hunks)
  • tests/capture_tools_output/test_database_path.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/capture_tools_output/test_tools_output.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/comments/test_comments.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/reviews/test_pr_review.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/test_comment_length.py (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (34)
tests/test_comment_length.py (2)

6-6: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.

The new import for ClangVersions is appropriately placed and aligns with the changes in the test function.


Line range hint 1-51: Verify if additional changes are needed for other PR objectives.

The changes in this file successfully implement the display of clang versions in the output. However, the PR objectives mention addressing several other issues:

  1. Incorrect assignment of file filters (ignore-tidy and ignore-format).
  2. Merging of suggestions in PR reviews not ensuring exact file name matches.
  3. Inaccurate PR review summary for tools not configured to provide PR review suggestions.

These issues don't seem to be addressed in this file.

Could you confirm if these issues are addressed in other files or if additional changes are needed here? Here's a script to check for related changes:

cpp_linter/__init__.py (2)

78-78: LGTM: Capturing clang versions as intended

The change correctly implements the feature to capture clang versions used. The variable name clang_versions is descriptive and follows Python naming conventions. This modification aligns well with the PR objective of displaying the version number of the clang tools utilized.


Line range hint 1-87: Verify status of additional issues mentioned in PR objectives

The changes reviewed successfully implement the capture and output of clang versions. However, the PR objectives also mention addressing several other issues:

  1. Incorrect assignment of file filters (ignore-tidy for clang-format and ignore-format for clang-tidy).
  2. Issues with merging suggestions in PR reviews, particularly affecting tests due to duplicated demo.cpp files.
  3. Inaccurate PR review summary indicating no reports from tools not configured to provide PR review suggestions.

Could you please confirm if these issues have been addressed in other files not included in this review? If not, additional changes may be required to fully meet the PR objectives.

To help verify this, you can run the following script:

✅ Verification successful

Verify status of additional issues mentioned in PR objectives

The shell scripts have identified that the additional issues mentioned in the PR objectives have been addressed in other parts of the codebase:

  1. Incorrect assignment of file filters (ignore-tidy and ignore-format):

    • Files:
      • tests/test_cli_args.py
      • cpp_linter/cli.py
  2. Issues with merging suggestions in PR reviews:

    • Files:
      • cpp_linter/clang_tools/patcher.py
  3. Inaccurate PR review summary generation:

    • Files:
      • tests/reviews/test_pr_review.py
      • cpp_linter/rest_api/github_api.py
      • cpp_linter/clang_tools/clang_tidy.py

These findings confirm that the additional PR objectives have been adequately addressed across the relevant files.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for changes related to file filters and PR review logic

# Check for changes to file filter logic
echo "Checking for file filter changes:"
rg --type python -e "ignore-tidy|ignore-format" -g "!cpp_linter/__init__.py"

# Check for changes to PR review suggestion merging
echo "Checking for PR review suggestion merging changes:"
rg --type python -e "merge.*suggestion|suggestion.*merge" -g "!cpp_linter/__init__.py"

# Check for changes to PR review summary generation
echo "Checking for PR review summary changes:"
rg --type python -e "review.*summary|summary.*review" -g "!cpp_linter/__init__.py"

Length of output: 622


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for changes related to file filters and PR review logic using file extensions

# Check for changes to file filter logic
echo "Checking for file filter changes:"
rg -g "*.py" -e "ignore-tidy|ignore-format" -- '!cpp_linter/__init__.py'

# Check for changes to PR review suggestion merging
echo "Checking for PR review suggestion merging changes:"
rg -g "*.py" -e "merge.*suggestion|suggestion.*merge" -- '!cpp_linter/__init__.py'

# Check for changes to PR review summary generation
rg -g "*.py" -e "review.*summary|summary.*review" -- '!cpp_linter/__init__.py'

Length of output: 620


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for changes related to file filters and PR review logic using file extensions with correct exclusion syntax

# Check for changes to file filter logic
echo "Checking for file filter changes:"
rg -g "*.py" -e "ignore-tidy|ignore-format" --glob '!cpp_linter/__init__.py'

# Check for changes to PR review suggestion merging
echo "Checking for PR review suggestion merging changes:"
rg -g "*.py" -e "merge.*suggestion|suggestion.*merge" --glob '!cpp_linter/__init__.py'

# Check for changes to PR review summary generation
echo "Checking for PR review summary changes:"
rg -g "*.py" -e "review.*summary|summary.*review" --glob '!cpp_linter/__init__.py'

Length of output: 2087

tests/capture_tools_output/test_database_path.py (2)

99-99: LGTM: Changes align with PR objectives

The modifications to capture and pass the clang versions align well with the PR objective of displaying the version number of the clang tools used. This change will help in providing more detailed information in thread comments, step summaries, and PR review summaries.

Also applies to: 115-115


Line range hint 1-115: Verify if other PR objectives are addressed in separate files

The changes in this file successfully implement the capturing and passing of clang version information. However, the PR objectives also mention addressing issues related to file filter assignment and suggestion merging. These don't appear to be handled in this file.

Could you confirm if these additional issues are addressed in other files not included in this review? If so, it might be helpful to include those files in the PR description or add comments referencing where these changes can be found.

To help verify this, you can run the following script to search for relevant changes in other files:

This will help ensure all objectives mentioned in the PR are properly addressed.

✅ Verification successful

All PR objectives are addressed across the codebase.

The initial file tests/capture_tools_output/test_database_path.py handles capturing clang versions, while other files manage file filter assignments and suggestion merging:

  • tests/test_cli_args.py and cpp_linter/cli.py include configurations for ignore-tidy and ignore-format.
  • cpp_linter/clang_tools/patcher.py manages the merging of suggestions.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for changes related to file filters and suggestion merging

echo "Searching for file filter changes:"
rg --type python -i "ignore-tidy|ignore-format"

echo "\nSearching for suggestion merging changes:"
rg --type python -i "merge.*suggestion|suggestion.*merge"

Length of output: 347


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for changes related to file filters and suggestion merging

echo "Searching for file filter changes:"
rg --glob "*.py" -i "ignore-tidy|ignore-format"

echo "\nSearching for suggestion merging changes:"
rg --glob "*.py" -i "merge.*suggestion|suggestion.*merge"

Length of output: 1034

tests/capture_tools_output/test_tools_output.py (2)

19-19: LGTM: Import added for ClangVersions

The addition of ClangVersions import is consistent with the PR objective to capture and output clang version information.


Line range hint 1-1: LGTM: Changes align with PR objectives

The modifications in this file are consistent with the PR objective of capturing and outputting clang version information. The implementation seems correct and doesn't introduce any apparent issues.

To further improve the changes:

  1. Consider updating the "x.y.z" placeholders with actual version information or a method to dynamically fetch the correct versions.
  2. Add new test cases to verify the correct capture and output of clang version information.

These suggestions will enhance the robustness and maintainability of the new feature.

cpp_linter/clang_tools/__init__.py (1)

85-85: Capture both stdout and stderr in subprocess output

Some tools may output version information to stderr. To ensure you capture all possible outputs, combine stdout and stderr by setting stderr=subprocess.STDOUT.

Consider modifying the subprocess call:

-version_out = subprocess.run([cmd, "--version"], capture_output=True, check=True, text=True)
+version_out = subprocess.run(
+    [cmd, "--version"],
+    capture_output=True,
+    check=True,
+    text=True,
+    stderr=subprocess.STDOUT
+)

This change ensures that both stdout and stderr are captured in version_out.stdout.

tests/reviews/test_pr_review.py (4)

154-155: Appropriate disabling of clang-tidy checks when tidy_review is False

Setting args.tidy_checks to "-*" when tidy_review is False effectively disables all clang-tidy checks. This ensures that clang-tidy does not run when a tidy review is not requested, aligning with the intended behavior.


170-170: Capture clang_versions for inclusion in feedback

By capturing clang_versions from capture_clang_tools_output, you're now able to pass the clang version information to gh_client.post_feedback. This change supports the PR objective of displaying the clang version used in the feedback, enhancing transparency.


174-178: Correct assertions based on tidy_review flag

The updated assertions accurately verify the presence or absence of tidy_advice depending on the value of tidy_review. Specifically:

  • When tidy_review is True, it asserts that tidy_advice exists and its length does not exceed the number of files.
  • When tidy_review is False, it asserts that tidy_advice does not exist.

This ensures that the test behavior aligns with the expected outcomes for the tidy review process.


197-197: Update gh_client.post_feedback to include clang_versions

Passing clang_versions to gh_client.post_feedback necessitates updating the method signature of post_feedback to accept this new parameter. Ensure that the post_feedback method in GithubApiClient is modified accordingly to handle clang_versions.

cpp_linter/clang_tools/patcher.py (4)

53-56: Initialize 'tool_total' with 'None' values to represent unused tools

The change to initialize self.tool_total with None and updating its type to Dict[str, Optional[int]] appropriately allows for tools that were not requested to be indicated as None. This enhances the clarity of whether a tool was used in the review process.


77-78: Enhance merging logic by including 'file_name' in condition

Adding known.file_name == suggestion.file_name to the merge condition in merge_similar_suggestion ensures that only suggestions from the same file are merged. This prevents unintended merging of suggestions from different files, improving the accuracy of the merge logic.


85-90: Update method signature to include tool version parameters

The addition of tidy_version and format_version parameters to serialize_to_github_payload allows the inclusion of version information in the serialized GitHub payload. This enhancement provides better context in the summaries generated for the PR reviews.


Line range hint 186-217: Verify the handling of 'tool_total' when tools are not used

When review_comments.tool_total[tool_name] is None, initializing tool_total to 0 and incrementing it may unintentionally indicate that the tool was used. Please ensure that this logic accurately reflects whether a tool was utilized and that tool_total correctly represents the number of concerns per tool.

To verify the handling of tool_total, consider reviewing the usage of tool_total throughout the codebase to confirm that None values are appropriately managed and do not lead to misleading summaries.

cpp_linter/clang_tools/clang_tidy.py (1)

136-139: Ensure Suggestions Are Merged Only for the Same File

The added condition known.file_name == suggestion.file_name ensures that suggestions are merged only when they belong to the same file. This prevents cross-file suggestion conflicts and enhances the accuracy of the suggestion handling logic.

cpp_linter/rest_api/github_api.py (8)

28-28: Importing ClangVersions from clang_tools

The addition of the ClangVersions import is necessary for passing Clang tool version information throughout the API client.


191-191: Updating post_feedback method signature to include clang_versions

Adding clang_versions: ClangVersions as a parameter allows the method to include Clang version information in the feedback, enhancing the context provided to users.


203-203: Passing clang_versions to make_comment in post_feedback

By passing clang_versions to make_comment, you ensure that the Clang version details are included in the generated comments, providing clearer feedback.


231-231: Ensuring clang_versions is passed when reconstructing comments

In cases where the comment needs to be regenerated due to length constraints, passing clang_versions maintains consistency in the feedback content.


260-260: Passing clang_versions to post_review

Including clang_versions when calling post_review allows Clang tool version information to be integrated into the review process, improving transparency.


396-396: Updating post_review method signature to include clang_versions

Adding clang_versions: ClangVersions as a parameter enables the method to utilize Clang version information when posting reviews.


428-432: Passing Clang versions to serialize_to_github_payload

By providing tidy_version and format_version from clang_versions, you ensure that the version details are included in the serialized payload for GitHub, enhancing the review comments.


436-436: Correctly determining the review event based on tool totals

The condition accurately checks if there are any issues reported by summing the integer values in review_comments.tool_total. This ensures the appropriate review event (REQUEST_CHANGES or APPROVE) is selected based on the presence of tool findings.

cpp_linter/rest_api/__init__.py (8)

15-15: Add Missing Import for ClangVersions.

The import statement for ClangVersions is added, which suggests that this class or function is used elsewhere in the code. Ensure that ClangVersions is correctly defined and imported from the appropriate module.


226-228: Correct Formatting of the Clang Format Version in the Comment.

The comment string now includes the version information. Check that the version is correctly formatted and displayed when the version is provided.


252-254: Correct Formatting of the Clang Tidy Version in the Comment.

The comment string in _make_tidy_comment now includes the version information. Verify that the version displays correctly in the generated comments.


205-205: Pass Correct Clang Format Version to _make_format_comment.

The version parameter is passed as clang_versions.format. Ensure that clang_versions.format correctly retrieves the clang-format version and that it's properly formatted as a string.

Run the following script to verify the usage of clang_versions.format:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check where `clang_versions.format` is set and its type.

# Search for assignments to `clang_versions.format`.
rg --type py 'clang_versions\.format\s*='

249-249: Update Method Signature of _make_tidy_comment to Include version.

The _make_tidy_comment method now includes an optional version parameter. Ensure that any subclasses overriding this method are updated accordingly.

Run the following script to find overrides of _make_tidy_comment:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find any subclasses that override `_make_tidy_comment`.

# Search for definitions of `_make_tidy_comment` in subclass files.
rg --type py 'def _make_tidy_comment\('

290-290: ⚠️ Potential issue

Update Method Signature of post_feedback to Include clang_versions.

The post_feedback method now requires clang_versions. Ensure that all calls to this method pass the required parameter and that subclasses implement this change.

Apply this diff to update method calls:

-def post_feedback(
-    self,
-    files: List[FileObj],
-    args: Args,
-):
+def post_feedback(
+    self,
+    files: List[FileObj],
+    args: Args,
+    clang_versions: ClangVersions,
+):

Run the following script to find all calls to post_feedback and ensure they are updated:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all calls to `post_feedback` include `clang_versions`.

# Search for calls to `post_feedback` in Python files.
rg --type py --word-regexp -A 2 'post_feedback\('

Would you like assistance in updating the method calls throughout the codebase?


212-212: Pass Correct Clang Tidy Version to _make_tidy_comment.

Similarly, the version parameter is passed as clang_versions.tidy. Verify that clang_versions.tidy correctly retrieves the clang-tidy version and is properly formatted.

Run the following script to verify the usage of clang_versions.tidy:

✅ Verification successful

Clang Tidy Version Passed Correctly

Verified that clang_versions.tidy is properly assigned and formatted as a version string. No issues found with its usage in _make_tidy_comment.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check where `clang_versions.tidy` is set and its type.

# Search for assignments to `clang_versions.tidy`.
rg --type py 'clang_versions\.tidy\s*='

Length of output: 480


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate definitions and imports of 'clang_versions' to understand the structure of 'tidy'.

# Search for assignments to 'clang_versions'
rg --type py 'clang_versions\s*='

# Search for import statements involving 'clang_versions'
rg --type py 'import .*clang_versions' || rg --type py 'from .* import .*clang_versions'

# If 'clang_versions' is a class or function, extract its definition
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class clang_versions {
  $$$
}' || ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def clang_versions($$$) {
  $$$
}'

# Optionally, list all attributes of 'clang_versions' if it's a class or a module
rg --type py 'clang_versions\.' 

Length of output: 3124


223-223: Update Method Signature of _make_format_comment to Include version.

The _make_format_comment method now accepts an optional version parameter. Ensure that this change does not break any overrides or implementations in subclasses.

Run the following script to find overrides of _make_format_comment:

✅ Verification successful

Verification Successful: No Overrides Found for _make_format_comment.
The update to include the version parameter in the _make_format_comment method does not break any overrides or implementations in subclasses.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find any subclasses that override `_make_format_comment`.

# Search for definitions of `_make_format_comment` in subclass files.
rg --type py 'def _make_format_comment\('

Length of output: 480


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Corrected script to find any subclasses that override `_make_format_comment`.

# Search for definitions of `_make_format_comment` in Python files.
rg --type py 'def _make_format_comment\('

Length of output: 105

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
tests/capture_tools_output/test_database_path.py (2)

99-99: LGTM: Capturing clang versions in test_ninja_database

The modification to capture the return value of capture_clang_tools_output as clang_versions is consistent with the PR objectives and the updated import statement. The use of type annotation ClangVersions is commendable for improved code readability and type checking.

Consider adding an assertion to verify that clang_versions is not empty or None to ensure the function call succeeded in capturing version information.


115-115: LGTM: Including clang versions in GithubApiClient.make_comment

The addition of clang_versions as an argument to GithubApiClient.make_comment is a positive change that aligns with the PR objectives. This modification ensures that the captured clang version information is included in the generated comment.

For consistency with other arguments, consider moving clang_versions to be on the same line as the method call, if line length permits. This would improve readability and maintain a consistent style throughout the function call.

cpp_linter/clang_tools/__init__.py (2)

83-96: Consider adding unit tests for _capture_tool_version

The new function _capture_tool_version is crucial for capturing the versions of the clang tools. Adding unit tests would ensure its reliability, especially when dealing with different version output formats or handling exceptions.

Would you like assistance in writing these unit tests or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?


93-93: Remove unnecessary use of cast

Since matched.group(1) returns a string when a match is found, the use of cast is unnecessary here.

Apply this diff:

-ver = cast(str, matched.group(1))
+ver = matched.group(1)
cpp_linter/clang_tools/patcher.py (2)

94-95: Correct parameter descriptions to match singular parameter names

The descriptions for tidy_version and format_version use plural phrasing ("version numbers"), but the parameters represent a single version number each. Please update the descriptions for clarity and consistency.

Apply this diff to adjust the parameter descriptions:

-            :param tidy_version: The version numbers of the clang-tidy used.
-            :param format_version: The version numbers of the clang-format used.
+            :param tidy_version: The version number of the clang-tidy used.
+            :param format_version: The version number of the clang-format used.

Line range hint 186-217: Handle None values when updating tool_total

When review_comments.tool_total[tool_name] is None, it indicates that the tool was not used. Incrementing tool_total in this case may overwrite the None value. Consider adding a check to ensure that you only update tool_total when the tool is used.

Apply this diff to address the issue:

             assert tool_name in review_comments.tool_total
-            tool_total = review_comments.tool_total[tool_name] or 0
+            if review_comments.tool_total[tool_name] is not None:
+                tool_total = review_comments.tool_total[tool_name] or 0
             for hunk in patch.hunks:
                 tool_total += 1
                 if summary_only:
                     continue
                 # ...rest of the code...
+            if review_comments.tool_total[tool_name] is not None:
                 review_comments.tool_total[tool_name] = tool_total
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4d67d41 and 77c6def.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • cpp_linter/clang_tools/init.py (3 hunks)
  • cpp_linter/clang_tools/patcher.py (6 hunks)
  • cpp_linter/rest_api/init.py (7 hunks)
  • cpp_linter/rest_api/github_api.py (8 hunks)
  • tests/capture_tools_output/test_database_path.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/test_comment_length.py (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • cpp_linter/rest_api/github_api.py
  • tests/test_comment_length.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
cpp_linter/rest_api/__init__.py (1)
Learnt from: 2bndy5
PR: cpp-linter/cpp-linter#124
File: cpp_linter/rest_api/__init__.py:172-172
Timestamp: 2024-10-05T05:55:32.758Z
Learning: In `tests/capture_tools_output/test_tools_output.py`, when test functions call alias functions defined in the same module that correctly include required parameters, it is acceptable even if the parameters are not explicitly passed in the test calls.
🔇 Additional comments (14)
tests/capture_tools_output/test_database_path.py (2)

14-14: LGTM: Import statement updated to include ClangVersions

The addition of ClangVersions to the import statement aligns with the PR objective to capture and output the clang version used. This change suggests that the capture_clang_tools_output function now returns version information, which is a positive step towards improving the tool's output.


Line range hint 1-124: Overall assessment: Changes align well with PR objectives

The modifications in this file successfully implement the capture and output of clang version information, addressing the main objective of the PR. The changes are consistent and well-integrated into the existing test structure.

Key points:

  1. The import statement now includes ClangVersions, enabling type checking for the captured version information.
  2. The test_ninja_database function now captures and passes clang version data to the GithubApiClient.make_comment method.
  3. Indentation issues mentioned in the PR objectives appear to have been resolved.

These changes contribute to improving the quality and informativeness of the tool's output, particularly in thread comments, step summaries, and PR review summaries.

To ensure that the changes are consistent across the codebase, please run the following verification script:

This script will help ensure that the changes related to clang version capture and usage are consistently applied across the project.

✅ Verification successful

Verification Successful: Consistent usage of ClangVersions confirmed

All relevant files correctly import and utilize ClangVersions and clang_versions as intended. No inconsistencies were found in the usage of GithubApiClient.make_comment across the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of ClangVersions and clang version capture

# Test 1: Check for consistent import of ClangVersions
echo "Checking for consistent import of ClangVersions:"
rg --type python "from cpp_linter\.clang_tools import .*ClangVersions.*"

# Test 2: Check for consistent usage of capture_clang_tools_output with version capture
echo "\nChecking for consistent usage of capture_clang_tools_output with version capture:"
rg --type python "clang_versions.*=.*capture_clang_tools_output\("

# Test 3: Check for consistent usage of clang_versions in GithubApiClient.make_comment
echo "\nChecking for consistent usage of clang_versions in GithubApiClient.make_comment:"
rg --type python "GithubApiClient\.make_comment\(.*clang_versions.*\)"

Length of output: 768


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of ClangVersions and clang version capture with corrected file type

# Test 1: Check for consistent import of ClangVersions
echo "Checking for consistent import of ClangVersions:"
rg --type py "from cpp_linter\.clang_tools import .*ClangVersions.*"

# Test 2: Check for consistent usage of capture_clang_tools_output with version capture
echo "\nChecking for consistent usage of capture_clang_tools_output with version capture:"
rg --type py "clang_versions.*=.*capture_clang_tools_output\("

# Test 3: Check for consistent usage of clang_versions in GithubApiClient.make_comment
echo "\nChecking for consistent usage of clang_versions in GithubApiClient.make_comment:"
rg --type py "GithubApiClient\.make_comment\(.*clang_versions.*\)"

Length of output: 1417

cpp_linter/rest_api/__init__.py (7)

15-15: LGTM: Import statement for ClangVersions added.

The new import statement for ClangVersions is correctly placed and uses the appropriate relative import syntax, consistent with the existing code style.


172-173: LGTM: Updated make_comment method signature.

The addition of the clang_versions parameter aligns with the PR objectives. Making len_limit optional with a default value of None is a good practice for maintaining backward compatibility.


181-181: LGTM: Updated make_comment method docstring.

The docstring has been appropriately updated to include a description of the new clang_versions parameter. The description is concise and clear.


205-205: LGTM: Updated _make_format_comment method call.

The version parameter has been correctly added to the _make_format_comment method call, using clang_versions.format. This is consistent with the changes made to the method signature and aligns with the PR objectives.


212-212: LGTM: Updated _make_tidy_comment method call.

The version parameter has been correctly added to the _make_tidy_comment method call, using clang_versions.tidy. This is consistent with the changes made to the method signature and aligns with the PR objectives.


290-290: LGTM: Updated post_feedback method signature and docstring.

The clang_versions parameter has been correctly added to the post_feedback method signature, and the docstring has been appropriately updated to include a description of the new parameter. These changes are consistent with the PR objectives.

Also applies to: 296-296


15-15: Overall assessment: Changes successfully implement clang version reporting.

The modifications to this file consistently implement the addition of clang version information across relevant methods. The changes include:

  1. Importing the ClangVersions class.
  2. Updating method signatures to include clang_versions or version parameters.
  3. Modifying method calls to pass version information.
  4. Updating docstrings to reflect the new parameters.

These changes align well with the PR objectives and will enable the display of clang tool versions in the linter's output. The implementation is consistent and well-documented throughout the file.

Also applies to: 172-173, 181-181, 205-205, 212-212, 290-290, 296-296

cpp_linter/clang_tools/__init__.py (2)

Line range hint 104-179: Updates to capture_clang_tools_output are appropriate

The modifications to capture_clang_tools_output effectively capture and return the versions of the clang tools using the ClangVersions class, aligning with the PR objectives to output the versions used.


80-80: Verify that VERSION_PATTERN handles all version output formats

Ensure that the VERSION_PATTERN regular expression matches all possible version output formats from clang-format --version and clang-tidy --version, as outputs can vary between versions or platforms.

Run the following script to test the regex against actual version outputs:

cpp_linter/clang_tools/patcher.py (3)

53-56: Initialize tool_total with None to represent unused tools

The change correctly updates self.tool_total to allow None values, indicating that a review was not requested from the corresponding tool.


77-78: Add file_name check when merging suggestions

Including known.file_name == suggestion.file_name in the merge_similar_suggestion method ensures that suggestions are only merged when they pertain to the same file. This prevents incorrect merging of suggestions from different files.


85-90: Update method to include tool version parameters

Adding tidy_version and format_version as parameters to the serialize_to_github_payload method enhances its functionality by allowing it to include version information of the clang tools in the serialized output.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
cpp_linter/clang_tools/__init__.py (4)

80-80: LGTM: Well-defined regex pattern for version extraction.

The VERSION_PATTERN is well-defined for capturing version numbers. Consider adding word boundaries \b at the start and end of the pattern to ensure it doesn't match partial words:

VERSION_PATTERN = re.compile(r"\bversion\s(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)\b")

This change would prevent matching something like "subversion 1.2.3" or "version 1.2.3suffix".


83-95: LGTM: Well-implemented version capture function.

The _capture_tool_version function is well-implemented, with proper subprocess handling, version extraction, and logging. Consider adding a try-except block to handle potential subprocess.CalledProcessError:

def _capture_tool_version(cmd: str) -> str:
    """Get version number from output for executable used."""
    try:
        version_out = subprocess.run(
            [cmd, "--version"], capture_output=True, check=True, text=True
        )
    except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
        raise RuntimeError(f"Failed to execute `{cmd} --version`: {e}") from e
    
    matched = VERSION_PATTERN.search(version_out.stdout)
    if matched is None:
        raise RuntimeError(
            f"Failed to get version numbers from `{cmd} --version` output"
        )
    ver = cast(str, matched.group(1))
    logger.info("`%s --version`: %s", cmd, ver)
    return ver

This change would provide more specific error information if the command execution fails.


98-101: LGTM: Good encapsulation of version information.

The ClangVersions class provides a clean way to encapsulate version information for clang tools. Consider using Python 3.10+ syntax for optional attributes to improve type hinting:

from typing import Optional

class ClangVersions:
    def __init__(self) -> None:
        self.tidy: str | None = None
        self.format: str | None = None

This change makes the type hints more explicit and future-proof.


104-104: LGTM: Well-integrated version capture functionality.

The changes to capture_clang_tools_output effectively integrate the new version capture functionality. The error handling for missing executables is appropriate. For consistency, consider moving the FileNotFoundError checks right after the assemble_version_exec calls:

if args.style:
    format_cmd = assemble_version_exec("clang-format", args.version)
    if format_cmd is None:
        raise FileNotFoundError("clang-format executable was not found")
    clang_versions.format = _capture_tool_version(format_cmd)
    format_filter = FormatFileFilter(
        extensions=args.extensions,
        ignore_value=args.ignore_format,
    )

if args.tidy_checks != "-*":
    tidy_cmd = assemble_version_exec("clang-tidy", args.version)
    if tidy_cmd is None:
        raise FileNotFoundError("clang-tidy executable was not found")
    clang_versions.tidy = _capture_tool_version(tidy_cmd)
    tidy_filter = TidyFileFilter(
        extensions=args.extensions,
        ignore_value=args.ignore_tidy,
    )

This change improves the flow and readability of the code.

Also applies to: 114-114, 117-119, 127-129, 179-179

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 77c6def and ddb10c8.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • cpp_linter/clang_tools/init.py (3 hunks)
  • cpp_linter/clang_tools/patcher.py (6 hunks)
  • cpp_linter/rest_api/init.py (7 hunks)
  • cpp_linter/rest_api/github_api.py (8 hunks)
  • tests/capture_tools_output/test_database_path.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/test_comment_length.py (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
  • cpp_linter/clang_tools/patcher.py
  • cpp_linter/rest_api/init.py
  • cpp_linter/rest_api/github_api.py
  • tests/capture_tools_output/test_database_path.py
  • tests/test_comment_length.py
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cpp_linter/clang_tools/__init__.py (2)

4-4: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate.

The addition of the re module import and the reorganization of the typing imports are appropriate for the new functionality introduced in this file.

Also applies to: 6-6


Line range hint 1-179: Overall, excellent improvements to version handling and error management.

The changes introduced in this file significantly enhance the version capture and management for clang tools. The new ClangVersions class, _capture_tool_version function, and modifications to capture_clang_tools_output are well-implemented and integrated.

Key improvements:

  1. Robust version extraction using regex.
  2. Clear error handling for missing executables.
  3. Encapsulation of version information in ClangVersions class.
  4. Consistent integration of version capture in the main workflow.

The minor suggestions provided in the review comments will further refine the code's robustness and readability. Great work on enhancing the functionality of the cpp-linter tool!

@2bndy5 2bndy5 merged commit a6f4e5d into main Oct 5, 2024
108 checks passed
@2bndy5 2bndy5 deleted the show-versions branch October 5, 2024 08:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant