Skip to content

fix: enhance parsing paginated diffs #125

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

fix: enhance parsing paginated diffs #125

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

2bndy5
Copy link
Contributor

@2bndy5 2bndy5 commented Oct 18, 2024

resolves cpp-liner/cpp-linter-action#274

  • fixes libgit2 diff parsing errors in paginated responses about changed files' diff.
  • allows renamed files to be scanned entirely when the source file's content has not changed (when using paginated responses)
  • add tests, but ignores coverage for critical errors (like malformed JSON responses)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced logging configuration to suppress file path display.
    • Introduced a new private attribute for the REST API client to hold the git server name, improving logging clarity.
    • Updated GitHub API client with better error handling and logging for file changes.
    • Added a constructor and updated method names in demo files for improved clarity.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in the GitHub API client for missing keys, ensuring more robust functionality.
  • Documentation

    • Updated test cases to include a new parameter for controlling line change considerations when retrieving changed files.

- fixes libgit2 diff parsing errors in paginated responses about changed files' diff.
- allows renamed files to be scanned entirely when the source file's content has not changed (when using paginated responses)
- add tests, but ignores coverage for critical errors (like malformed JSON responses)
@2bndy5 2bndy5 added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Oct 18, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the logging configuration, enhancements to the RestApiClient and GithubApiClient classes, and updates to test cases in the test_get_file_changes.py file. The logging setup now suppresses file paths, and both API clients have introduced a new _name attribute for better logging context. Error handling has been improved in the GithubApiClient, and test functions have been updated to accommodate a new parameter for controlling line change retrieval.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
cpp_linter/loggers.py Updated RichHandler initialization in logging.basicConfig to include show_path=False. Maintained existing logging functions and structure.
cpp_linter/rest_api/init.py Added private attribute _name to RestApiClient class, initialized to "Generic". Modified logging in _rate_limit_exceeded method to include _name.
cpp_linter/rest_api/github_api.py Added _name attribute to GithubApiClient, initialized to "GitHub". Enhanced _get_changed_files_paginated method with error handling for missing keys and improved logic for handling renamed files. Updated make_annotations method for better clang-tidy logging.
tests/list_changes/pull_request_files_pg2.json, tests/list_changes/push_files_pg2.json Added constructor Dummy() :numb(0), useless("\\0") {} in src/demo.hpp. Renamed method not_usefull to not_useful and simplified its implementation. Introduced long diff; in LongDiff struct. Renamed include/test-tree.hpp to include/test/tree.hpp with no content changes.
tests/list_changes/test_get_file_changes.py Updated test_get_changed_files function to include lines_changed_only parameter. Modified pytest.mark.parametrize to cover new test cases and updated assertions based on this parameter.

Poem

In the land of code where bunnies play,
New changes hop in, brightening the day.
With logs that shine and names that cheer,
Our code now dances, bringing good cheer!
So let’s celebrate with a joyful thump,
For every small change, we give a big jump! 🐰✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 26a3567 and 6e7706f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cpp_linter/rest_api/github_api.py (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • cpp_linter/rest_api/github_api.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/list_changes/pull_request_files_pg2.json (1)

Line range hint 26-30: New member variable added to LongDiff struct

A new member variable long diff; has been added to the LongDiff struct. This change looks good, but consider the following suggestions:

  1. Add a comment explaining the purpose of this new member.
  2. Consider initializing the variable in a constructor to ensure it always has a valid state.

Consider applying the following changes:

 struct LongDiff
 {
-
-    long diff;
+    // Explain the purpose of this member
+    long diff;
+
+    LongDiff() : diff(0) {}  // Default constructor with initialization
 };
tests/list_changes/test_get_file_changes.py (1)

149-152: Assertions updated correctly with a suggestion for improvement.

The modifications to the assertions correctly handle the new lines_changed_only parameter. The conditional check for lines_changed_only == 0 ensures that the additional file "include/test/tree.hpp" is only expected when all lines are included, which is consistent with the test cases.

However, to improve clarity and maintainability, consider extracting the expected files into a variable that's conditionally populated. This would make the assertion more readable and easier to modify in the future.

Here's a suggested improvement:

expected_files = ["src/demo.cpp", "src/demo.hpp"]
if lines_changed_only == 0:
    expected_files.append("include/test/tree.hpp")

assert file.name in expected_files

This change would make the code more explicit about which files are expected in each case.

cpp_linter/rest_api/github_api.py (1)

49-50: Add a docstring or comment for the _name attribute

To enhance code readability and maintainability, consider adding a docstring or inline comment explaining the purpose of the _name attribute.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6f4e5d and 26a3567.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • cpp_linter/loggers.py (1 hunks)
  • cpp_linter/rest_api/init.py (2 hunks)
  • cpp_linter/rest_api/github_api.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/list_changes/pull_request_files_pg2.json (1 hunks)
  • tests/list_changes/push_files_pg2.json (1 hunks)
  • tests/list_changes/test_get_file_changes.py (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (13)
tests/list_changes/push_files_pg2.json (4)

Line range hint 9-9: Constructor added to Dummy class

A default constructor has been added to the Dummy class, initializing numb to 0 and useless to an empty string. This is a good practice for proper initialization.


12-13: Method renamed and simplified

The method not_usefull has been renamed to not_useful, fixing a typo. Its implementation has been simplified by removing the unnecessary return statement. These changes improve code clarity and correctness.


16-22: File renamed: include/test-tree.hpp to include/test/tree.hpp

The file has been moved from include/test-tree.hpp to include/test/tree.hpp. This change improves the directory structure by placing the tree.hpp file in a test subdirectory within the include folder. This is a good practice for better organization of header files.


Line range hint 1-22: Verify alignment with PR objectives

The changes in this file, which appear to be test data, show improvements to code quality and project structure. However, they don't directly address the stated PR objective of enhancing parsing for paginated diffs. Please ensure that the actual implementation changes related to diff parsing are included in other files of this PR.

To confirm the presence of relevant changes, you can run the following script:

tests/list_changes/pull_request_files_pg2.json (2)

Line range hint 5-9: Constructor added to Dummy class

A default constructor has been added to the Dummy class, initializing numb to 0 and useless to "\0". This is a good practice for providing default initialization.


15-21: File renamed and moved

The file has been renamed from include/test-tree.hpp to include/test/tree.hpp. This change improves the directory structure by moving the file into a test subdirectory. However, consider the following:

  1. Ensure that all references to this file in other parts of the codebase have been updated accordingly.
  2. If this file is part of a public API, be aware that this change might break existing code that includes this header.

To verify that all references have been updated, run the following script:

If the script returns any results, those files need to be updated to use the new path.

✅ Verification successful

All references to the old filename have been successfully updated

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old filename
rg "test-tree\.hpp" --type cpp

Length of output: 32


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old filename across all file types
rg "test-tree\.hpp"

Length of output: 209

cpp_linter/loggers.py (1)

15-15: Approved change, but clarification needed

The addition of show_path=False to the RichHandler is a valid modification to the logging configuration. This change will make the logs more concise by suppressing the display of file paths.

However, I have a few points to discuss:

  1. How does this logging change relate to the PR objectives of enhancing parsing of paginated diffs? It seems unrelated to the stated goals.

  2. While this change can make logs more readable, it might also reduce context for debugging. Have you considered the potential impact on troubleshooting?

  3. It would be helpful to add a comment explaining the rationale behind this change. This can help future maintainers understand why the file paths are being suppressed.

To ensure this change doesn't conflict with any existing logging expectations, let's check for any references to log paths in the tests or documentation:

tests/list_changes/test_get_file_changes.py (4)

19-61: Excellent enhancement to test coverage!

The addition of the lines_changed_only parameter to the pytest.mark.parametrize decorator significantly improves the test coverage. The new test cases for both changed lines only (lines_changed_only=1) and all lines (lines_changed_only=0) ensure that the functionality is thoroughly tested under different scenarios.

The integration of the new parameter into existing test cases and the addition of new ones are well-structured and consistent with the existing test design.


83-83: Function signature updated correctly.

The addition of the lines_changed_only: int parameter to the test_get_changed_files function signature is consistent with the changes made to the pytest.mark.parametrize decorator. This ensures that the new parameter is properly passed to the test function for each test case.


145-146: Method call updated correctly.

The get_list_of_changed_files method call has been properly updated to include the new lines_changed_only parameter. This change ensures that the test cases utilize the new functionality as intended, allowing for testing of both changed lines only and all lines scenarios.


Line range hint 19-152: Comprehensive enhancement of test coverage aligned with PR objectives.

The changes to the test_get_changed_files function significantly improve its coverage and align well with the PR objectives. By introducing the lines_changed_only parameter and associated test cases, the function now tests both scenarios where only changed lines are considered and where all lines are included. This enhancement directly addresses the PR's goal of improving the parsing of paginated diffs and allowing for complete scanning of renamed files.

The modifications are consistently implemented throughout the test function, from the pytest.mark.parametrize decorator to the assertions. This ensures that the new functionality is thoroughly tested across various scenarios, including push events, pull request events, and paginated diffs.

The changes maintain the existing structure of the test function while seamlessly integrating the new parameter, making the code easy to understand and maintain. This comprehensive approach to testing will help ensure the reliability of the new functionality in handling different types of diffs and file changes.

cpp_linter/rest_api/__init__.py (2)

43-45: LGTM: Addition of _name attribute enhances flexibility.

The introduction of the _name attribute is a good addition. It allows for better identification of different REST API providers and enhances the flexibility of the RestApiClient class. This change aligns well with the PR objectives of improving error handling and enhancing functionality.


59-60: LGTM: Improved error message clarity and flexibility.

The modification of the logging message in the _rate_limit_exceeded method is a good improvement. By using self._name instead of a hardcoded API name, the error message becomes more flexible and informative across different REST API providers. This change enhances error handling and aligns well with the PR objectives.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (a6f4e5d) to head (6e7706f).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #125   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           24        24           
  Lines         1826      1837   +11     
=========================================
+ Hits          1826      1837   +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@2bndy5 2bndy5 merged commit baee3c2 into main Oct 18, 2024
109 checks passed
@2bndy5 2bndy5 deleted the fix-paginated-diff branch October 18, 2024 03:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant