Skip to content

Add microseconds support for DateTimeField #293

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 9, 2016
Merged

Conversation

rdbisme
Copy link
Contributor

@rdbisme rdbisme commented Jun 9, 2016

A check is introduced in the DateTimeField to understand if microseconds
are provided in the datetime string or not. The return value is then
handled in accordance to that check.

Tests related to the feature implemented are also introduced.

Doctest examples are updated too.

Fix #292

rdbisme added 2 commits June 9, 2016 21:47
A check is introduced in the DateTimeField to understand if microseconds
are provided in the datetime string or not. The return value is then
handled in accordance to that check.

Tests related to the feature implemented are also introduced.

Doctest examples are updated too.
A check is introduced in the DateTimeField to understand if microseconds
are provided in the datetime string or not. The return value is then
handled in accordance to that check.

Tests related to the feature implemented are also introduced.

Doctest examples are updated too.
@djc
Copy link
Owner

djc commented Jun 9, 2016

Looks good to me, thanks!

@rdbisme
Copy link
Contributor Author

rdbisme commented Jun 9, 2016

Wait. There's a Z missing in the test. I'm committing in few minutes the small edit :)

@djc djc merged commit 65da210 into djc:master Jun 9, 2016
@rdbisme rdbisme deleted the issues/292 branch June 9, 2016 20:12
@rdbisme rdbisme restored the issues/292 branch June 9, 2016 20:12
@rdbisme rdbisme deleted the issues/292 branch June 9, 2016 20:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants