[release/10.0] Remove duplicate RedirectManager injection in Blazor Web App ChangePassword template #63452
+0
−1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: ilonatommy <32700855+ilonatommy@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@ilonatommy can you fill in the ask mode template? |
This was referenced Aug 27, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport of #63447 to release/10.0
/cc @javiercn @copilot
Remove duplicate RedirectManager injection in Blazor Web App ChangePassword template
Description
Removes a redundant line from identity template.
Fixes #63445
Customer Impact
Before this change customers were getting confused, code analyzer was underlining the duplicated variable. There was no build or run error. After this change, the code looks normal, without warnings from the analyzer.
Regression?
Before merging #61633 we had only one
RedirectManager.Risk
The change concerns only templates. What's more, it does not change how the template works, it just removes a redundant code line.
Verification
Packaging changes reviewed?