Skip to content

Commit c2b46d6

Browse files
Lv Zhengrafaeljw
authored andcommitted
ACPI / EC: Add PM operations to improve event handling for resume process
This patch makes 2 changes: 1. Restore old behavior Originally, EC driver stops handling both events and transactions in acpi_ec_block_transactions(), and restarts to handle transactions in acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early(), restarts to handle both events and transactions in acpi_ec_unblock_transactions(). While currently, EC driver still stops handling both events and transactions in acpi_ec_block_transactions(), but restarts to handle both events and transactions in acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early(). This patch tries to restore the old behavior by dropping __acpi_ec_enable_event() from acpi_unblock_transactions_early(). 2. Improve old behavior However this still cannot fix the real issue as both of the acpi_ec_unblock_xxx() functions are invoked in the noirq stage. Since the EC driver actually doesn't implement the event handling in the polling mode, re-enabling the event handling too early in the noirq stage could result in the problem that if there is no triggering source causing advance_transaction() to be invoked, pending SCI_EVT cannot be detected by the EC driver and _Qxx cannot be triggered. It actually makes sense to restart the event handling in any point during resuming after the noirq stage. Just like the boot stage where the event handling is enabled in .add(), this patch further moves acpi_ec_enable_event() to .resume(). After doing that, the following 2 functions can be combined: acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early()/acpi_ec_unblock_transactions(). The differences of the event handling availability between the old behavior (this patch isn't applied) and the new behavior (this patch is applied) are as follows: !Applied Applied before suspend Y Y suspend before EC Y Y suspend after EC Y Y suspend_late Y Y suspend_noirq Y (actually N) Y (actually N) resume_noirq Y (actually N) Y (actually N) resume_late Y (actually N) Y (actually N) resume before EC Y (actually N) Y (actually N) resume after EC Y (actually N) Y after resume Y (actually N) Y Where "actually N" means if there is no triggering source, the EC driver is actually not able to notice the pending SCI_EVT occurred in the noirq stage. So we can clearly see that this patch has improved the situation. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Tested-by: Todd E Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
1 parent e923e8e commit c2b46d6

File tree

3 files changed

+13
-18
lines changed

3 files changed

+13
-18
lines changed

drivers/acpi/ec.c

Lines changed: 11 additions & 15 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -909,8 +909,7 @@ static void acpi_ec_start(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool resuming)
909909
if (!resuming) {
910910
acpi_ec_submit_request(ec);
911911
ec_dbg_ref(ec, "Increase driver");
912-
} else
913-
__acpi_ec_enable_event(ec);
912+
}
914913
ec_log_drv("EC started");
915914
}
916915
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
@@ -965,19 +964,6 @@ void acpi_ec_block_transactions(void)
965964
}
966965

967966
void acpi_ec_unblock_transactions(void)
968-
{
969-
struct acpi_ec *ec = first_ec;
970-
971-
if (!ec)
972-
return;
973-
974-
/* Allow transactions to be carried out again */
975-
acpi_ec_start(ec, true);
976-
977-
acpi_ec_enable_event(ec);
978-
}
979-
980-
void acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early(void)
981967
{
982968
/*
983969
* Allow transactions to happen again (this function is called from
@@ -1706,10 +1692,20 @@ static int acpi_ec_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
17061692
acpi_ec_leave_noirq(ec);
17071693
return 0;
17081694
}
1695+
1696+
static int acpi_ec_resume(struct device *dev)
1697+
{
1698+
struct acpi_ec *ec =
1699+
acpi_driver_data(to_acpi_device(dev));
1700+
1701+
acpi_ec_enable_event(ec);
1702+
return 0;
1703+
}
17091704
#endif
17101705

17111706
static const struct dev_pm_ops acpi_ec_pm = {
17121707
SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(acpi_ec_suspend_noirq, acpi_ec_resume_noirq)
1708+
SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(NULL, acpi_ec_resume)
17131709
};
17141710

17151711
static int param_set_event_clearing(const char *val, struct kernel_param *kp)

drivers/acpi/internal.h

Lines changed: 0 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ int acpi_ec_ecdt_probe(void);
189189
int acpi_ec_dsdt_probe(void);
190190
void acpi_ec_block_transactions(void);
191191
void acpi_ec_unblock_transactions(void);
192-
void acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early(void);
193192
int acpi_ec_add_query_handler(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 query_bit,
194193
acpi_handle handle, acpi_ec_query_func func,
195194
void *data);

drivers/acpi/sleep.c

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
586586
*/
587587
acpi_disable_all_gpes();
588588
/* Allow EC transactions to happen. */
589-
acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early();
589+
acpi_ec_unblock_transactions();
590590

591591
suspend_nvs_restore();
592592

@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static void acpi_hibernation_leave(void)
784784
/* Restore the NVS memory area */
785785
suspend_nvs_restore();
786786
/* Allow EC transactions to happen. */
787-
acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early();
787+
acpi_ec_unblock_transactions();
788788
}
789789

790790
static void acpi_pm_thaw(void)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)