-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7k
Implement HttpRequest proxying with __getattr__ for optimized access. #5576
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -249,3 +249,28 @@ def test_default_secure_false(self): | |
def test_default_secure_true(self): | ||
request = Request(factory.get('/', secure=True)) | ||
assert request.scheme == 'https' | ||
|
||
|
||
class TestWSGIRequestProxy(TestCase): | ||
def test_access_inner_property(self): | ||
wsgi_request = factory.get('/') | ||
|
||
sentinel = object() | ||
wsgi_request.__dict__['inner_property'] = sentinel | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It shouldn't be necessary to do reference the underlying `dict. Regular attribute setting should be sufficient. wsgi_request.inner_property = sentinel |
||
|
||
request = Request(wsgi_request) | ||
|
||
assert request.inner_property is sentinel | ||
|
||
def test_access_outer_property(self): | ||
wsgi_request = factory.get('/') | ||
|
||
inner_sentinel = object() | ||
wsgi_request.__dict__['inner_property'] = inner_sentinel | ||
|
||
request = Request(wsgi_request) | ||
|
||
outer_sentinel = object() | ||
request.__dict__['inner_property'] = outer_sentinel | ||
|
||
assert request.inner_property is outer_sentinel |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is actually necessary. It was in the original implementation, since we were re-raising from the attribute access on the underlying
WSGIRequest
object. In this case, we're raising fromRequest.__getattribute__
, so catching and reraising should be superfluous.