Skip to content

Drop Python 3.8 as EOL #9635

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Drop Python 3.8 as EOL #9635

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

auvipy
Copy link
Member

@auvipy auvipy commented Jan 29, 2025

After DRF 3.16 release is done, it might be right time to drop python 3.8 support... until then

@auvipy
Copy link
Member Author

auvipy commented Feb 14, 2025

we have to decide when we will drop python 3.8

@tomchristie
Copy link
Member

@auvipy I'd prefer it if issues like this linked cleanly to Python's deprecation timelines.

@browniebroke
Copy link
Member

I'd prefer it if issues like this linked cleanly to Python's deprecation timelines.

I agree that's an ideal place we should aim for. If I'm realistic, though, we're not there yet. I think we should release bug fixes more often (perhaps on a monthly basis?) and align our feature releases (3.x) to be close to Django's.

Dropping EOL Python versions can be done as soon as possible to be released the next time we bump the minor version (assuming we'll never bump the major again).

Copy link
Collaborator

@carltongibson carltongibson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be merged now, assuming a new release to be v3.16.

@carltongibson
Copy link
Collaborator

@browniebroke @auvipy @tomchristie Anything else on your radar before a release?

FWIW Django 5.0 will be EOL very shortly, and DRF does not yet officially declare support for Django 5.1 or 5.2. A release of current development branch (plus this PR, optionally) resolves that issue.

@browniebroke
Copy link
Member

I think this should be merged now, assuming a new release to be v3.16.

I'm also in favour of doing this now

@carltongibson carltongibson marked this pull request as ready for review March 28, 2025 10:57
Copy link
Member

@browniebroke browniebroke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should also update docs/index.md:

* Python (3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13)

@carltongibson
Copy link
Collaborator

Updated in #9670

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants