Skip to content

Update singleton_thread_locals.py #252

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 17, 2020
Merged

Update singleton_thread_locals.py #252

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 17, 2020

Conversation

RobinsonMa
Copy link
Contributor

fix

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 16, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 93.598% when pulling fda3083 on RobinsonMa:patch-1 into efd6e3e on ets-labs:master.

@rmk135 rmk135 self-assigned this Jun 16, 2020
@rmk135 rmk135 self-requested a review June 16, 2020 14:28
rmk135
rmk135 requested changes Jun 16, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@rmk135 rmk135 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've left a comment about provider naming. Take a look, please.
Also change the branch to develop, please.

examples/providers/singleton_thread_locals.py Outdated
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ def example(example_object, queue):
thread_local_object = providers.ThreadLocalSingleton(object)

# Create singleton provider for thread-safe queue:
queue = providers.Singleton(Queue.Queue)
queue = providers.ThreadSafeSingleton(queue.Queue)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please, rename queue to queue_factory. As of now, queue variable overrides the name of the imported module. It's a bad practice. Also queue_factory name will be consistent with thread_factory at line 26.

RobinsonMa
RobinsonMa commented Jun 17, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@RobinsonMa RobinsonMa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've changed

@RobinsonMa RobinsonMa changed the base branch from master to develop June 17, 2020 01:51
rmk135
rmk135 approved these changes Jun 17, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@rmk135 rmk135 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@rmk135 rmk135 merged commit c136663 into ets-labs:develop Jun 17, 2020
@rmk135
Copy link
Member

rmk135 commented Jun 17, 2020

@RobinsonMa , thank you for contribution. It will be on production today.

@RobinsonMa
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rmk135 ,It's my pleasure

@rmk135
Copy link
Member

rmk135 commented Jun 17, 2020

@RobinsonMa , the code is on production http://python-dependency-injector.ets-labs.org/providers/singleton.html#singleton-providers-and-multi-threading

I've added you to CONTRIBUTORS file. It's distributed with an every copy - https://github.com/ets-labs/python-dependency-injector/blob/master/CONTRIBUTORS.rst

Changelog is also updated. See version 3.16.1 at http://python-dependency-injector.ets-labs.org/main/changelog.html

Roman

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@rmk135 rmk135 rmk135 approved these changes

Assignees

@rmk135 rmk135

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@RobinsonMa @coveralls @rmk135