Skip to content

Explanation of the Factory Method pattern #198

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 13, 2017
Merged

Explanation of the Factory Method pattern #198

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 13, 2017

Conversation

mshcruz
Copy link
Contributor

@mshcruz mshcruz commented Jun 13, 2017

Disclaimer: I've been looking for a project to start contributing to OSS, and this one seemed interesting and not too complicated. Since I'm a newbie in all this, any advice and suggestions are welcome! Thanks!

I intend to work on the issue "Short descriptions #184" (#184), and the first step was to include some explanation about the Factory Method pattern.
If possible, I would like some feedback on the description I added so I can have a better idea on what to do with the others.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 13, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #198 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #198   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.73%   94.73%           
=======================================
  Files          61       61           
  Lines        2431     2431           
=======================================
  Hits         2303     2303           
  Misses        128      128
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
creational/factory_method.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e3d1dd0...c71e9a2. Read the comment docs.

@faif faif merged commit 140fabe into faif:master Jun 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants