Skip to content

Nanosecond-precision timestamps #82

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 4, 2017
Merged

Conversation

luhn
Copy link
Contributor

@luhn luhn commented Mar 21, 2017

The author of #61 disappeared, so I'm taking over.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.5%) to 90.256% when pulling b4e69fc on luhn:nanosecond-time into 5c4dff1 on fluent:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 90.355% when pulling 82040c8 on luhn:nanosecond-time into 5c4dff1 on fluent:master.

@repeatedly
Copy link
Member

Thanks!
After finished CNCF event, I will check it 👍

@repeatedly repeatedly self-assigned this Mar 30, 2017
@repeatedly repeatedly merged commit fffa39a into fluent:master Apr 4, 2017
@repeatedly
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants