Skip to content

[GHSA-j3g3-5qv5-52mj] net-imap rubygem vulnerable to possible DoS by memory exhaustion #5494

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

nevans
Copy link

@nevans nevans commented Apr 30, 2025

Updates

  • Description
  • References

Comments
I had linked to the wrong PR.

@github
Copy link
Collaborator

github commented Apr 30, 2025

Hi there @nevans! A community member has suggested an improvement to your security advisory. If approved, this change will affect the global advisory listed at github.com/advisories. It will not affect the version listed in your project repository.

This change will be reviewed by our Security Curation Team. If you have thoughts or feedback, please share them in a comment here! If this PR has already been closed, you can start a new community contribution for this advisory

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the base branch from main to nevans/advisory-improvement-5494 April 30, 2025 16:20
@advisory-database advisory-database bot merged commit c3d135c into nevans/advisory-improvement-5494 Apr 30, 2025
4 checks passed
@advisory-database
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @nevans! Thank you so much for contributing to the GitHub Advisory Database. This database is free, open, and accessible to all, and it's people like you who make it great. Thanks for choosing to help others. We hope you send in more contributions in the future!

@advisory-database advisory-database bot deleted the nevans-GHSA-j3g3-5qv5-52mj branch April 30, 2025 17:58
@JonathanLEvans
Copy link

Hi @nevans, thank you for the update. For future reference, if you update the advisory in your repo, we automatically get updated so you don't need to make a separate request here.

@nevans
Copy link
Author

nevans commented Apr 30, 2025

@JonathanLEvans Thanks! That's very useful information. Because I've definitely tweaked the advisories in the repo a few times.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants