Skip to content

fix the application timeline information #39766

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

fykaa
Copy link

@fykaa fykaa commented Aug 10, 2025

Why:

the docs has incorrect information about the program application timelines, you can find the accurate info here:
Authentic source 1: https://education.github.com/campus_experts
Authentic source 2: https://github.com/campus-experts/.github/blob/master/profile/README.md?plain=1#L19

Closes:

What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):

Check off the following:

  • A subject matter expert (SME) has reviewed the technical accuracy of the content in this PR. In most cases, the author can be the SME. Open source contributions may require an SME review from GitHub staff.
  • The changes in this PR meet the docs fundamentals that are required for all content.
  • All CI checks are passing and the changes look good in the review environment.

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 10, 2025 15:05
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This pull request corrects the application timeline information for the GitHub Campus Expert program. The PR updates the documentation to reflect the accurate application schedule based on authoritative sources.

  • Updates application timing from "February and August" to "every July"

@github-actions github-actions bot added the triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team label Aug 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 10, 2025

How to review these changes 👓

Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:

A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.

Table of review links

Note: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace.

The table shows the files in the content directory that were changed in this pull request. This helps you review your changes on a staging server. Changes to the data directory are not included in this table.

Source Review Production What Changed
education/about-github-education/use-github-at-your-educational-institution/applying-to-be-a-github-campus-expert.md fpt
fpt

Key: fpt: Free, Pro, Team; ghec: GitHub Enterprise Cloud; ghes: GitHub Enterprise Server

🤖 This comment is automatically generated.

@Sharra-writes
Copy link
Contributor

@fykaa Thanks for opening a PR for these fixes! Some of our checks are a little off-the-rails at the moment, so I'll get this merged once we get them fixed. Sorry about the delay!

@Sharra-writes Sharra-writes added content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team education Content related to GitHub Education and removed triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team labels Aug 11, 2025
@Aminu464
Copy link

Why:

the docs has incorrect information about the program application timelines, you can find the accurate info here: Authentic source 1: https://education.github.com/campus_experts Authentic source 2: https://github.com/campus-experts/.github/blob/master/profile/README.md?plain=1#L19

Closes:

What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):

Check off the following:

  • A subject matter expert (SME) has reviewed the technical accuracy of the content in this PR. In most cases, the author can be the SME. Open source contributions may require an SME review from GitHub staff.
  • The changes in this PR meet the docs fundamentals that are required for all content.
  • All CI checks are passing and the changes look good in the review environment.

@benaz14
Copy link

benaz14 commented Aug 12, 2025 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team education Content related to GitHub Education
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants