@olleolleolle I bet you are interested in collaborating with me on this one? 😃

Hello!

The metadata of a change is quite important to this project.

A description which explains how something is wrong and what has been done to right it and why this all matters to a user. That's part of communicating your intent to others who wonder.

Can you find and link to any discussion which weighs the issue somewhere?

I'm sure there's context to this somewhere, but I can't find it from this PR.

There you go: #450 @olleolleolle

Thank you for this PR!

@olleolleolle I guess there are some post-development to do for this removal. Let me see what I could find out!

@olleolleolle @Lucashuang0802 Is this change a bugfix or a breaking change? If the latter, then the next version of GCG will be v2.0.0 to account for this, yeah?

@olleolleolle @skywinder Is it possible to revert this change? It removes important functionality. By removing it, it undermines the ability of users to explain how they require enhancements to this functionality (to add even more options to specify only including updates that fall between tags).

Maybe I am misunderstanding this, but it seems it was merged with no description and no chance to solicit wider feedback. What was the purpose of this change?

You linked to the previous issue #450 but it actually seems like some people in the comments are saying that --between-tags is extremely important for them to use, and they need actually feature enhancements or better documentation, not feature removal. I don't see any evidence from #450 that this was a good candidate for removal, but perhaps I am missing something?