Skip to content

BF: install_requires not just requires for setup() call #873

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

yarikoptic
Copy link
Contributor

Originally detected while running DataLad tests on CRON datalad/datalad#3395 although mystery remains why not earlier.

To say the truth I am not fan of the approach (defer to reading requirements.txt) introduced in ce21f63 but I guess it is a separate issue

Originally detected while running DataLad tests on CRON
  datalad/datalad#3395
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 7, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #873 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #873   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.79%   94.79%           
=======================================
  Files          59       59           
  Lines        9607     9607           
=======================================
  Hits         9107     9107           
  Misses        500      500

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 11fd713...6224c72. Read the comment docs.

@yarikoptic
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think this one is obvious so I will just merge it

@yarikoptic yarikoptic merged commit 0f6bf79 into gitpython-developers:master May 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants