Skip to content

Conversation

dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

@dhermes dhermes commented Sep 2, 2016

No description provided.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Sep 2, 2016
@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor Author

dhermes commented Sep 2, 2016

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
[nosetests]
exclude-dir = system_tests

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

@dhermes dhermes force-pushed the use-pytest branch 3 times, most recently from 26626a2 to 19df78b Compare September 2, 2016 21:04
@@ -44,15 +39,18 @@ deps =
basepython =
python2.7
commands =
{[testing]covercmd} --cover-min-percentage=100
{[testing]covercmd}
coverage report --show-missing --fail-under=100

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

In the process, fixing some PATH issues in "gcloud._helpers"
(path separator was explicitly provided, rather than using
"os.join"). Also the the associated tests were refactored
with more mocks so that they depend less on the OS.
@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor Author

dhermes commented Sep 2, 2016

The continuous-integration/travis-ci/push check came up because I pushed theGoogleCloudPlatform/gcloud-python:use-pytest branch to this project. (I did it so that the AppVeyor tests would spawn, mentioned above.)

That job didn't fail, I just canceled it, since it would be repetetive to run both PUSH/PR for the same exact code.

This should be ready to merge if I can get an LGTM.

@theacodes
Copy link
Contributor

Lgtm

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016, 4:49 PM Danny Hermes notifications@github.com wrote:

The continuous-integration/travis-ci/push check came up because I pushed
theGoogleCloudPlatform/gcloud-python:use-pytest branch to this project.
(I did it so that the AppVeyor tests would spawn, mentioned above.)

That job didn't fail, I just canceled it, since it would be repetetive to
run both PUSH/PR for the same exact code.

This should be ready to merge if I can get an LGTM.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#2241 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPUczhDUyiQmLqvqj2h4ZD2C7wdYa8bks5qmLXugaJpZM4Jz_YD
.

@dhermes dhermes merged commit d586990 into googleapis:master Sep 3, 2016
@dhermes dhermes deleted the use-pytest branch September 3, 2016 00:18
@dhermes dhermes mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. testing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants