feat: upgrade BQ managed udf to preview
#1536
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jialuoo
reviewed
Mar 25, 2025
|
Even though the managed udfs tests are disabled currently, I ran them locally successfully. |
shobsi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2025
* feat: upgrade BQ managed `udf` to preview * remove `_udf` footprint, add preview warning * capture references in remote_function * keep capture_references default to the curren tbehavior (True) for remote_function * target e2e tests to python 3.12 * used "udf" instead of "managed function" in the user facing messages * clarify the self-contained udf in the doc * export udf from pandas module --------- Co-authored-by: jialuoo <jialuo@google.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> 🦕