Skip to content

Add support for Go 1.7. #495

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Aug 21, 2016
Merged

Add support for Go 1.7. #495

merged 12 commits into from
Aug 21, 2016

Conversation

dmitshur
Copy link
Member

@dmitshur dmitshur commented Aug 16, 2016

This is the PR to add support for Go 1.7, which has been released recently.

It's still WIP. Most tests are passing thanks to @neelance's work so far, but there are a few that are not.

Known issues:

Resolves #475 when merged.

1 of 5 failures is os/exec usage, which is definitely not supported.

Another bug is with runtime.Caller not printing the right output. I'm
not sure if this is supported, since "runtime" package support is said
to be "partial" in the compatibility table. /cc @neelance In any case,
CI right now doesn't have IO module installed, so there's no way it
could pass. Maybe later.

The other 3 bugs are valid issues that have been found after 1.6 was
released. Marked them with validButDealWithAfterGo17SinceNew category,
and marked as "known failures" for now. We can have a TODO to resolve
them and turn them into real issues after GopherJS support for Go 1.7
is out. /cc @neelance
@dmitshur
Copy link
Member Author

Great, as of f8e7e29, the go test -v -race ./... step is passing (but of course we'll have more real issues to actually resolve after this is merged). So just the other one left. 😛

@benechols-wf
Copy link

Quick check with go1.7 and it appears to be working for me!

@neelance neelance merged commit b33dd36 into master Aug 21, 2016
@neelance neelance deleted the go1.7 branch August 21, 2016 16:24
@dmitshur dmitshur changed the title Add support for Go 1.7 (WIP). Add support for Go 1.7. Feb 17, 2017
@dmitshur dmitshur mentioned this pull request Mar 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants