Skip to content

fix case when a fragment is deferred and non deferred at the same time #3953

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andimarek
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

initialResult.toSpecification() == [
data: [post: [summary: "A summary", text: "The full text"]]
]

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you assert on the incremental payloads as well?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do you want to assert exactly? there is no incremental result in this case: is that correct?

Should we add another test case with some incremental result?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're right. I misread your test scenario.
In that case, do we need to assert that there aren't incremental payloads? Like, initialResult is not IncrementalExecutionResult?
And perhaps change the name of the variable, initialResult gives the impression that this is an incremental result.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2025

Test Results

  314 files    314 suites   53s ⏱️
3 586 tests 3 581 ✅ 5 💤 0 ❌
3 675 runs  3 670 ✅ 5 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 79f3aa5.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants