Skip to content

Add documentation about SCSGate #181

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Add documentation about SCSGate #181

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

flavio
Copy link
Contributor

@flavio flavio commented Jan 31, 2016

This adds the documentation about the SCSGate code that has been merged with this pull request.

There's one thing I don't understand, only the main page about SCSGate and the one about the lights module show up. The others are not translated to html. Do you have any idea about why this is happening?

@balloob
Copy link
Member

balloob commented Jan 31, 2016

Can you point this PR at the next branch? Also, no need to create the HTML files. Those are only there for backwards compatibility/old URLs generated by the old version of our site generator.

@balloob
Copy link
Member

balloob commented Jan 31, 2016

Jekyll is 'smart' and does not recompile every page on change if you're running it with --incremental. Restarting local compilation should show the pages.

jekyll serve --incremental

@flavio
Copy link
Contributor Author

flavio commented Feb 1, 2016

Jekyll is 'smart' and does not recompile every page on change if you're running it with --incremental. Restarting local compilation should show the pages.

That's strange, I never had this problem with Jekyll before (I also tried a rake clean && rake generate but it didn't help.

However, that fixed the issue.

I've just one little problem: when I go to the SCSGate component the lights are the only suggested module being shown. Neither the switch nor the roller shutter are there. Any idea?

@flavio
Copy link
Contributor Author

flavio commented Feb 1, 2016

Can you point this PR at the next branch?

Sorry, my fault. I'll do that, but unfortunately I'll have to create a new PR.

@flavio
Copy link
Contributor Author

flavio commented Feb 1, 2016

Also, no need to create the HTML files. Those are only there for backwards compatibility/old URLs generated by the old version of our site generator.

I'll get rid of them with my next PR

Signed-off-by: Flavio Castelli <fcastelli@suse.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants