Glossary: add YAML definition #35017
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce a new glossary entry for the term "YAML" in the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
source/_data/glossary.yml (1)
585-588: LGTM! Consider adding an excerpt for tooltips.The addition of the YAML term is accurate and well-placed. The definition and link are appropriate for Home Assistant users. To enhance usability, consider adding an excerpt for tooltip display.
You could add an excerpt like this:
- term: YAML definition: >- YAML is a human-readable data serialization language. It is used to store and transmit data in a structured format. In Home Assistant, YAML is used for configuration, for example in the `configuration.yaml` or `automations.yaml` files. link: /docs/configuration/yaml/ + excerpt: >- + YAML is a human-readable data serialization language used for configuration in Home Assistant, such as in `configuration.yaml` and `automations.yaml` files.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- source/_data/glossary.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
source/_data/glossary.yml (1)
585-588: Changes align with PR objectivesThe addition of the YAML term to the glossary fulfills the PR objective of enhancing the documentation. This new entry provides users with a clear definition of YAML and its relevance to Home Assistant, improving the overall comprehensiveness of the glossary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
source/_docs/scene.markdown (3)
32-32: LGTM! Consider applying this change consistently throughout the document.The use of the
{% term YAML %}tag for "YAML" is a good improvement for standardizing terminology. This change enhances the documentation's clarity and consistency.Consider reviewing the rest of the document to ensure that all instances of "YAML" are updated to use this new tag format for consistency.
Line range hint
1-100: Enhance code block readability with syntax highlightingTo improve the readability of the YAML examples in this document, consider adding syntax highlighting to the code blocks. You can do this by specifying the language after the opening triple backticks.
For example, change:
```yamlto:
```yamlThis will provide syntax highlighting for YAML code blocks, making them easier to read and understand.
Line range hint
1-100: Consider adding a reference to the new YAML definitionGiven that the main objective of this PR is to add a YAML definition to the glossary, it would be beneficial to reference this new addition in this document.
Consider adding a note or link to the glossary entry for YAML, perhaps near the first mention of YAML in this document. This could help users who are unfamiliar with YAML to quickly access its definition.
For example, you could add something like:
For more information on YAML, see the [glossary entry](link-to-glossary#yaml).source/_docs/configuration/packages.markdown (1)
20-20: LGTM with a minor suggestion for clarity.The use of
{% term %}for "YAML" improves consistency in terminology formatting, which aligns well with the PR objectives. This change enhances the readability of the documentation.Consider adding a brief explanation or link to what YAML is, as this might be helpful for newcomers. For example:
-It can be specified inline or in a separate {% term YAML %} file using `!include`. +It can be specified inline or in a separate {% term YAML %} file (a human-readable data serialization format) using `!include`.Or, if you prefer to keep it concise, you could add a link to the YAML specification:
-It can be specified inline or in a separate {% term YAML %} file using `!include`. +It can be specified inline or in a separate {% term YAML %} file using `!include`. [Learn more about YAML](https://yaml.org/)source/_docs/automation/using_blueprints.markdown (1)
92-92: Consider using "who" instead of "that" for better readabilityIn the sentence "The username of the user that created it", consider replacing "that" with "who" as it refers to a person. This small change would improve the grammar and readability of the sentence.
Suggested change:
- The username of the user that created it. + The username of the user who created it.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~92-~92: Consider using “who” when you are referring to a person instead of an object.
Context: ...sists of: - The username of the user that created it. The name depends on the sou...(THAT_WHO)
source/_docs/automation/yaml.markdown (1)
225-225: LGTM with a minor suggestionThe addition of the {% term YAML %} tag is consistent with the rest of the document. However, there's a minor grammatical issue that could be addressed.
Consider adding a comma after "If not specified" for better readability:
-When using {% term YAML %} you can configure the number of debugging traces stored for an automation. This is controlled with the `stored_traces` option under `trace`. Set `stored_traces` to the number of traces you wish to store for the particular automation. If not specified the default value of 5 will be used. +When using {% term YAML %} you can configure the number of debugging traces stored for an automation. This is controlled with the `stored_traces` option under `trace`. Set `stored_traces` to the number of traces you wish to store for the particular automation. If not specified, the default value of 5 will be used.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~225-~225: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...e for the particular automation. If not specified the default value of 5 will be used. `...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- source/_docs/automation/using_blueprints.markdown (1 hunks)
- source/_docs/automation/yaml.markdown (5 hunks)
- source/_docs/configuration/packages.markdown (2 hunks)
- source/_docs/configuration/secrets.markdown (2 hunks)
- source/_docs/configuration/troubleshooting.markdown (2 hunks)
- source/_docs/scene.markdown (1 hunks)
- source/_docs/scene/editor.markdown (1 hunks)
- source/_docs/troubleshooting_general.markdown (1 hunks)
- source/_includes/common-tasks/configuration_check.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- source/_docs/configuration/secrets.markdown
- source/_docs/configuration/troubleshooting.markdown
- source/_docs/scene/editor.markdown
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
source/_docs/automation/using_blueprints.markdown
[style] ~92-~92: Consider using “who” when you are referring to a person instead of an object.
Context: ...sists of: - The username of the user that created it. The name depends on the sou...(THAT_WHO)
source/_docs/automation/yaml.markdown
[uncategorized] ~225-~225: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...e for the particular automation. If not specified the default value of 5 will be used. `...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
🪛 Markdownlint
source/_includes/common-tasks/configuration_check.md
13-13: null
Link fragments should be valid(MD051, link-fragments)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
source/_docs/troubleshooting_general.markdown (1)
33-33: Excellent addition of the term template for YAML!This change enhances the documentation by wrapping "YAML" with the
{% term YAML %}template. This modification aligns well with the PR objectives of improving the glossary and documentation clarity. It provides users with an easy way to access the YAML definition, which is particularly helpful in the context of troubleshooting invalid configuration files.source/_docs/automation/using_blueprints.markdown (3)
86-86: LGTM: Consistent use of YAML termThe change to use
{% term YAML %}instead of plain "YAML" improves consistency in terminology presentation throughout the documentation. This aligns well with the PR objective to enhance clarity.
94-94: LGTM: Consistent terminology usageThe change to use
{% term YAML %}here maintains consistency with the previous modification. This standardization of terminology enhances the overall clarity and professionalism of the documentation.
Line range hint
121-121: LGTM with a minor query: Verify backtick usage in term tagThe change to use
{% term "configuration.yaml" %}is consistent with the standardization of terminology in this PR. However, please verify if the backticks within the term tag are intentional and follow the established convention for your documentation.To ensure consistency across the documentation, let's check the usage of backticks within term tags:
✅ Verification successful
To address the regex errors in the shell scripts, please run the following corrected scripts to verify the usage of backticks within term tags:
LGTM: Consistent with documentation style, but backtick usage is uncommon
The change to use
{% term "configuration.yaml" %}is consistent with the standardization of terminology in this PR. However, it's worth noting that while this format (including backticks within the term tag) is used in a few places across the documentation, it's less common than term tags without backticks. Consider aligning with the more prevalent style by removing the backticks, unless there's a specific reason for their inclusion in this context.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of backticks within term tags in Markdown files # Test: Search for term tags with backticks rg --type md '{% term .*`.*`.* %}' # Test: Search for term tags without backticks for comparison rg --type md '{% term [^`\n]+ %}'Length of output: 261
Script:
# !/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of backticks within term tags in Markdown files # Test: Search for term tags with backticks rg --type md '\{% term .*`.*`.* %\}' # Test: Search for term tags without backticks for comparison rg --type md '\{% term [^`\n]+ %\}'Length of output: 408427
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~92-~92: Consider using “who” when you are referring to a person instead of an object.
Context: ...sists of: - The username of the user that created it. The name depends on the sou...(THAT_WHO)
source/_docs/automation/yaml.markdown (5)
6-10: LGTM: Consistent use of terminology tagsThe changes in this segment improve the documentation by consistently using {% term %} tags for key terms like YAML, automation, and configuration.yaml. This enhances readability and maintains uniformity throughout the document.
130-130: LGTM: Consistent terminology taggingThis change maintains the consistent use of {% term %} tags for YAML and configuration.yaml, aligning with the overall documentation improvements.
209-209: LGTM: Consistent YAML taggingThe addition of the {% term YAML %} tag here maintains consistency with the rest of the document.
265-265: LGTM: Consistent YAML taggingThe addition of the {% term YAML %} tag here maintains consistency with the rest of the document.
Line range hint
1-270: Summary: Documentation enhancement achievedThe changes in this file successfully achieve the PR objective of enhancing the documentation by consistently applying {% term %} tags to key terms, particularly YAML. This improves the uniformity of terminology presentation throughout the document.
Key points:
- Consistent application of {% term %} tags to YAML, automation, and configuration.yaml.
- No functional changes to the content, focusing solely on terminology presentation.
- One minor grammatical suggestion made for improved readability.
Overall, these changes contribute positively to the documentation quality and align well with the project's documentation standards.
This reverts commit 61de2c5.
Proposed change
Type of change
currentbranch).currentbranch).nextbranch).nextbranch).Additional information
Checklist
currentbranch.nextbranch.Summary by CodeRabbit