Skip to content

Move Example resources to Troubleshooting for easier readability of NUT #38502

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

tdfountain
Copy link
Contributor

@tdfountain tdfountain commented Apr 13, 2025

Proposed change

NUT currently has a section named "Example Resources" that describes how to query NUT directly. Since the commands referenced are not part of the NUT integration, this section fits better in Troubleshooting. Add an appropriate sub-header. Change the example to use a named UPS and define the value. Remove the information on the sensors provided by the NUT integration since those are now documented elsewhere on the page. This section now parallels the "Using NUT to list all commands" Troubleshooting section.

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

  • Link to parent pull request in the codebase:
  • Link to parent pull request in the Brands repository:
  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Reorganized the troubleshooting content for enhanced clarity.
    • Removed an outdated resource section and added a new Troubleshooting section with detailed guidance.
    • Introduced a new subsection on using NUT to list all variables, including updated sample command usage and expanded output examples.

@tdfountain tdfountain requested a review from bdraco as a code owner April 13, 2025 03:33
@home-assistant home-assistant bot added the current This PR goes into the current branch label Apr 13, 2025
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 13, 2025

Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5e55052
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/67fdf098aae47d00087052ef
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-38502--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 13, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The update reorganizes the NUT integration documentation by removing the "Example resources" section and introducing a new "Troubleshooting" section. A new subsection, "Using NUT to list all variables," has been added to provide updated instructions and an example command that queries a device named my_ups. Existing troubleshooting content has been retained and repositioned following the new subsection.

Changes

File Change Summary
source/_integrations/nut.markdown Removed the "Example resources" section; added a "Troubleshooting" section with a new subsection "Using NUT to list all variables" demonstrating an updated command example and expanded output details; repositioned previous troubleshooting content.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 86b9100 and 5e55052.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/nut.markdown (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
source/_integrations/nut.markdown (4)

335-381: Excellent reorganization and improved clarity in troubleshooting documentation

The new "Troubleshooting" section, especially "Using NUT to list all variables," is well-placed and provides a clear, actionable example for users needing to query their NUT server directly. The example now uses a named UPS (my_ups), which is more typical and less confusing than the previous IP-based example. The expanded output gives users a realistic expectation of what they will see.

Removing the note about supported variable prefixes is appropriate since this information is already documented elsewhere, reducing redundancy.

No issues found—this change improves readability and usability for users troubleshooting their NUT integration.


383-401: Retained and repositioned troubleshooting content is consistent and clear

The section "Using NUT to list all commands" is retained and follows logically after the new variables section. The example is consistent with the previous section, using the same device name (my_ups). The instructions are clear and actionable.

No issues found—this maintains consistency and improves the flow of troubleshooting steps.


402-419: User credentials and permissions section is accurate and well-integrated

This section provides essential information for users who may encounter permission issues when executing commands. The example for the upsd.users file is clear and directly relevant. The note about Home Assistant's inability to pre-check permissions is important for user expectations.

No issues found—this section is technically accurate and well-placed in the troubleshooting context.


421-427: Integration removal instructions remain clear and standard

The instructions for removing the integration are unchanged and remain clear, following Home Assistant documentation standards.

No issues found.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
source/_integrations/nut.markdown (2)

304-304: Formatting: Extra Blank Line

Static analysis detected multiple consecutive blank lines here. Please remove one blank line so that only a single blank line appears, in order to comply with markdown style guidelines (MD012).

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

304-304: Multiple consecutive blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 2

(MD012, no-multiple-blanks)


305-340: Code Block Markup Consideration

The code block shows the command output from running $ upsc my_ups. Although it’s currently marked as a yaml block, consider switching to a shell block to more accurately represent command-line output. If the YAML formatting is intentional (e.g., for additional styling or structure), be sure that this choice is documented.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3434cc and 0e28b37.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/nut.markdown (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
source/_integrations/nut.markdown

304-304: Multiple consecutive blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 2

(MD012, no-multiple-blanks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
source/_integrations/nut.markdown (2)

293-295: Reorganizing Documentation for Clarity

The introduction of the new "Troubleshooting" section along with the "Using NUT to list all variables" subheading clearly aligns with the PR objective. Moving the example away from a generic "Example resources" section improves the readability and focus of the documentation.


297-302: Concise and Clear Instructions

The descriptive text explaining how to use the upsc command with a device named my_ups is well written and provides the necessary context for troubleshooting. Ensure that any related cross-links in the documentation are updated to reflect this change.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/nut.markdown (1)

293-294: Introduce New Troubleshooting Section

The addition of the "## Troubleshooting" section is well executed. This clearly signals a reorganization of content and improves the overall readability of the documentation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0e28b37 and 86b9100.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/nut.markdown (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - home-assistant-docs
🔇 Additional comments (2)
source/_integrations/nut.markdown (2)

295-302: New Subsection “Using NUT to list all variables” is Clear

The newly added subsection effectively explains how to query NUT variables. Using a named device (my_ups) instead of an IP address directly improves clarity and contextual relevance. The instruction flow is logical and aligns with the intent to shift non-integration-specific content to troubleshooting.


304-339: Accurate and Well-Formatted Shell Command Example

The provided shell code block with the upsc my_ups command is properly formatted and illustrates the expected output clearly. This helps users understand what to expect when querying the NUT server for variables.

frenck
frenck previously requested changes Apr 14, 2025
Copy link
Member

@frenck frenck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh hi there @tdfountain 👋

There is a merge conflict, can you take a look?

Thanks 👍

../Frenck

@home-assistant home-assistant bot marked this pull request as draft April 14, 2025 13:16
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to In Progress in Documentation PRs Apr 14, 2025
@home-assistant
Copy link

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

@tdfountain tdfountain marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2025 05:45
@home-assistant home-assistant bot requested a review from frenck April 15, 2025 05:45
Copy link
Contributor

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @tdfountain 👍

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 dismissed frenck’s stale review April 15, 2025 06:47

merge conflict has been resolved

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 merged commit 18a5b7a into home-assistant:current Apr 15, 2025
7 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in Documentation PRs Apr 15, 2025
joshuaboniface pushed a commit to joshuaboniface/home-assistant.io that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2025
…UT (home-assistant#38502)

* Move Example resources section into Troubleshooting

* Change example to shell

* Remove extra blank line
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 16, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
current This PR goes into the current branch
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants