-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.6k
Add known limitations section to ESPHome #38618
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
required for quality scale
✅ Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new "Known Limitations" section was added to the ESPHome integration documentation. This section details the necessity for each ESPHome device to have a unique name, explaining its importance for mDNS announcements, device discovery, reconnections after deep sleep, and correct operation with the ESPHome Device Builder Add-on. It also highlights potential issues that may arise from using duplicate device names, such as connection failures and erratic behavior. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ESPHome Device
participant Integration
participant Add-on
User->>ESPHome Device: Assign unique device name
ESPHome Device->>Integration: Announce via mDNS/DHCP
Integration->>ESPHome Device: Discover and connect
ESPHome Device->>Add-on: Link with Device Builder Add-on
Note over Integration,Add-on: Unique name ensures proper discovery and linkage
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/esphome.markdown (1)
117-117
: Nit: Align heading capitalization with style guide
The new section title uses Title Case ("Known Limitations"), whereas other headings mix cases (e.g., "Home Assistant actions"). Consider adjusting to "Known limitations" if that better matches the existing style.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
source/_integrations/esphome.markdown
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - home-assistant-docs
- GitHub Check: Header rules - home-assistant-docs
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - home-assistant-docs
🔇 Additional comments (2)
source/_integrations/esphome.markdown (2)
120-121
: Approve: Clear explanation of unique-name requirement
This paragraph succinctly explains why each ESPHome device needs a unique name—covering mDNS announcements, discovery, reconnection after deep sleep, and add-on linkage.
122-122
: Approve: Impact of duplicate names is well articulated
The warning about connection failures, discovery issues, and erratic behavior effectively communicates the risks of using duplicate device names.
thanks |
Proposed change
required for quality scale
Type of change
current
branch).current
branch).next
branch).next
branch).Additional information
Checklist
current
branch.next
branch.Summary by CodeRabbit