Skip to content

Removing the integration #38675

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 22, 2025
Merged

Removing the integration #38675

merged 8 commits into from
Apr 22, 2025

Conversation

c0ffeeca7
Copy link
Contributor

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 commented Apr 22, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Proposed change

Removing the integration - streamline wording

  • apply gerund (ing-form) to indicate procedural content

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

  • Link to parent pull request in the codebase:
  • Link to parent pull request in the Brands repository:
  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Standardized section headings across multiple integration guides by updating "Remove integration" to "Removing the integration."
    • In the SolarLog integration guide, relocated the removal instructions to the end of the document for improved clarity and flow. No changes were made to the actual instructions or content.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added the current This PR goes into the current branch label Apr 22, 2025
@netlify Netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

✅ Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ca9f6d2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/6807ae50306a6200082ae766
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-38675--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 22, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This update standardizes the section headings related to integration removal across multiple documentation files by changing "Remove integration" to "Removing the integration." In one instance, for the SolarLog integration, the removal section was also relocated to a more logical position in the document, but its content remains unchanged. No other content, instructions, or exported entities were modified in any of the affected files.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
source/_integrations/acaia.markdown,
airgradient.markdown,
aquacell.markdown,
bring.markdown,
cookidoo.markdown,
eheimdigital.markdown,
electric_kiwi.markdown,
enigma2.markdown,
flick_electric.markdown,
fronius.markdown,
fyta.markdown,
habitica.markdown,
homewizard.markdown,
husqvarna_automower.markdown,
incomfort.markdown,
iometer.markdown,
ista_ecotrend.markdown,
knx.markdown,
lcn.markdown,
letpot.markdown,
mcp.markdown,
mcp_server.markdown,
nut.markdown,
overseerr.markdown,
powerfox.markdown,
pyload.markdown,
rainbird.markdown,
reolink.markdown,
slide_local.markdown,
suez_water.markdown,
weheat.markdown		 Changed the section heading from "Remove integration" to "Removing the integration" without altering section content.
source/_integrations/solarlog.markdown Relocated the removal section after "Known limitations" and changed heading to "Removing the integration"; content unchanged.

Sequence Diagram(s)

No sequence diagram is generated as the changes are limited to documentation heading updates and do not affect control flow or functional logic.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ecb41de and ca9f6d2.

📒 Files selected for processing (32)
  • source/_integrations/acaia.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/airgradient.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/aquacell.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/bring.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/cookidoo.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/eheimdigital.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/electric_kiwi.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/enigma2.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/flick_electric.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/fronius.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/fyta.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/habitica.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/homewizard.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/husqvarna_automower.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/incomfort.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/iometer.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/ista_ecotrend.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/knx.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/lcn.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/letpot.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/mcp.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/mcp_server.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/nut.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/overseerr.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/powerfox.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/pyload.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/rainbird.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/reolink.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/slide_local.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/solarlog.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/suez_water.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/weheat.markdown (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - home-assistant-docs
🔇 Additional comments (32)
source/_integrations/suez_water.markdown (1)

64-64: Heading style consistency applied correctly
The change from “## Remove integration” to “## Removing the integration” aligns with the gerund-based section headings used throughout the documentation, improving readability and consistency.

source/_integrations/weheat.markdown (1)

84-84: Consistent heading update
The section heading has been correctly changed from “Remove integration” to “Removing the integration” to match the gerund style applied across other integration docs. This improves consistency and readability.

source/_integrations/mcp_server.markdown (1)

237-237: Use gerund form for consistency in section headings.

The heading has been updated from “Remove integration” to “Removing the integration” to align with the gerund style applied across other integration docs.

source/_integrations/lcn.markdown (1)

816-816: Heading updated to gerund form for consistency
The change from “## Remove integration” to “## Removing the integration” aligns with the PR objective of standardizing section headings across the documentation. This gerund form more clearly indicates a procedural step and matches the style applied in other integration docs.

source/_integrations/incomfort.markdown (1)

96-96: Standardize heading to gerund form
The section heading has been updated from "Remove integration" to "Removing the integration" to align with the procedural gerund style used elsewhere in the docs.

source/_integrations/flick_electric.markdown (1)

106-106: Consistent gerund header for removal section
The section header has been correctly updated to “## Removing the integration” to match the gerund style applied across other integration docs. This enhances readability and maintains uniformity.

source/_integrations/overseerr.markdown (1)

142-142: Heading changed for consistency
Updating the section title to use the gerund form (“Removing the integration”) aligns with the procedural style guidelines and matches the rest of the documentation.

source/_integrations/reolink.markdown (1)

496-496: Approve: Updated removal section heading for consistency
The new gerund-form heading “Removing the integration” aligns with the style applied across other integration docs and improves readability.

source/_integrations/electric_kiwi.markdown (1)

73-73: Heading updated to gerund form for consistency
The change from “Remove integration” to “Removing the integration” adheres to the PR’s objective of standardizing section titles across the documentation and enhances procedural readability.

source/_integrations/fyta.markdown (1)

118-118: Consistent gerund tense applied to heading
The heading has been updated from “Remove integration” to “Removing the integration” to align with the procedural style used elsewhere in the documentation. This change improves readability and maintains consistency.

source/_integrations/ista_ecotrend.markdown (1)

116-116: Consistent gerund usage in heading
The section heading has been correctly updated from “Remove integration” to “Removing the integration,” matching the style applied across other integration docs.

source/_integrations/powerfox.markdown (1)

95-95: Heading updated to gerund form
The section heading has been changed from “Remove integration” to “Removing the integration,” matching the revised style guidelines for procedural content across all integration docs.

source/_integrations/eheimdigital.markdown (1)

52-52: Consistent section heading style
The updated heading “## Removing the integration” aligns with the gerund style used across other integration documentation.

source/_integrations/fronius.markdown (1)

199-199: Update section heading to gerund form
The heading has been changed from “Remove integration” to “Removing the integration,” which aligns with the repository-wide style of using gerunds for procedural sections. This is a clear readability improvement.

source/_integrations/rainbird.markdown (1)

149-149: Consistent gerund-form section heading
The heading has been updated to “## Removing the integration,” which aligns with the gerund‑style phrasing adopted across other integration docs. Looks good!

source/_integrations/iometer.markdown (1)

62-62: Consistent gerund usage in section heading.

The heading has been correctly updated from "Remove integration" to "Removing the integration" to align with the gerund style guide, improving clarity and consistency across the documentation.

source/_integrations/knx.markdown (1)

2459-2462: Heading updated correctly for consistency
The section title has been changed to "Removing the integration," matching the documentation-wide style guide to use gerund forms for procedural headings.

source/_integrations/slide_local.markdown (1)

80-80: Heading standardized successfully
The updated gerund form "Removing the integration" aligns with the documentation style guidelines for procedural sections. No further edits needed here.

source/_integrations/husqvarna_automower.markdown (1)

229-233: Good catch: Standardized heading to gerund form
The section heading has been updated from "Remove integration" to "Removing the integration" to align with the gerund style used across the documentation. This enhances consistency and clarity throughout the guides.

source/_integrations/cookidoo.markdown (1)

114-114: Standardized gerund heading: The section title has been updated to the gerund form ("Removing the integration"), aligning with the PR’s objective and matching the standardized headings across other integration documentation.

source/_integrations/acaia.markdown (1)

111-111: Consistent gerund heading
Updated the section header from “Remove integration” to “Removing the integration” to match the gerund style used throughout the documentation for procedural sections.

source/_integrations/aquacell.markdown (1)

101-101: Apply gerund form to heading
Changed “Remove integration” to “Removing the integration” for consistency with other integration docs and to improve readability.

source/_integrations/airgradient.markdown (1)

87-87: Standardize removal heading phrasing
Switched the section title to “Removing the integration” to align with the updated documentation style guidelines.

source/_integrations/pyload.markdown (1)

165-165: Uniform heading style
Updated the heading to “Removing the integration” to maintain consistency across all integration guides.

source/_integrations/mcp.markdown (1)

97-97: Consistent section heading
Changed to the gerund form “Removing the integration” to ensure uniformity with other integration removal sections.

source/_integrations/bring.markdown (1)

221-221: Standardize removal section heading using gerund form
Changed the heading from “Remove integration” to “Removing the integration” to align with the updated style guidelines and maintain consistency across integration docs.

source/_integrations/habitica.markdown (1)

577-577: Standardize removal section heading using gerund form
Updated the heading to “Removing the integration” for consistency with the broader documentation style.

source/_integrations/enigma2.markdown (1)

93-93: Standardize removal section heading using gerund form
Replaced “Remove integration” with “Removing the integration” to maintain uniform procedural headings across docs.

source/_integrations/letpot.markdown (1)

117-117: Standardize removal section heading using gerund form
Changed the section title to “Removing the integration” in line with the updated documentation style guidelines.

source/_integrations/nut.markdown (1)

437-437: Standardize removal section heading using gerund form
Updated heading to “Removing the integration” to ensure consistency with other integration documentation.

source/_integrations/homewizard.markdown (1)

184-190: Editorial: Updated section heading to gerund form
The change from “## Remove integration” to “## Removing the integration” aligns with the PR objective to use gerund‑form headings for procedural steps. The heading level and surrounding content remain consistent with other integration docs.

source/_integrations/solarlog.markdown (1)

141-145: Editorial: Relocated and standardized removal section
The “## Removing the integration” heading has been moved to the end of the document and updated to the gerund form, improving the logical flow and matching the style applied across other integration guides. The included snippet and instructions remain correct and unchanged.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 merged commit 2196f95 into current Apr 22, 2025
9 checks passed
@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 deleted the removing-the-integration branch April 22, 2025 15:22
@c0ffeeca7
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks!

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 23, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@jpelgrom jpelgrom jpelgrom approved these changes

@Ernst79 Ernst79 Awaiting requested review from Ernst79 Ernst79 is a code owner

@starkillerOG starkillerOG Awaiting requested review from starkillerOG starkillerOG is a code owner

@allenporter allenporter Awaiting requested review from allenporter allenporter is a code owner

@klaasnicolaas klaasnicolaas Awaiting requested review from klaasnicolaas klaasnicolaas is a code owner

@joostlek joostlek Awaiting requested review from joostlek joostlek is a code owner

@bdraco bdraco Awaiting requested review from bdraco bdraco is a code owner

@farmio farmio Awaiting requested review from farmio farmio is a code owner

@marvin-w marvin-w Awaiting requested review from marvin-w marvin-w is a code owner

@jbouwh jbouwh Awaiting requested review from jbouwh jbouwh is a code owner

@zweckj zweckj Awaiting requested review from zweckj zweckj is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
current This PR goes into the current branch
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@c0ffeeca7 @jpelgrom