Skip to content

Update WMS WebControl pro button and cover documentation #38857

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update WMS WebControl pro button and cover documentation #38857

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

mback2k
Copy link
Contributor

@mback2k mback2k commented May 2, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Proposed change

Enhance documentation regarding button and cover support.

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated WMS WebControl pro integration documentation to include support for button devices.
    • Added a new section describing button device capabilities.
    • Clarified and expanded descriptions for covers, including roller shutters, blinds, and awnings.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added has-parent This PR has a parent PR in a other repo next This PR goes into the next branch labels May 2, 2025
@netlify Netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented May 2, 2025 •
edited
Loading

✅ Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit dba8e8b
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/6818bf65e3e79400088cc098
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-38857--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@mback2k mback2k mentioned this pull request May 2, 2025
Open
19 tasks
@mback2k mback2k marked this pull request as ready for review May 2, 2025 15:27
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 2, 2025 •
edited
Loading

📝 Walkthrough

"""

Walkthrough

The documentation for the WMS WebControl pro integration was updated to reflect support for a new device category: buttons. The changes include listing "button" as a supported platform, adding a section describing button devices, updating device category references, and clarifying the description of cover devices to specify roller shutters/blinds and other supported covers. No code or API signatures were modified; all changes are limited to documentation.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
source/_integrations/wmspro.markdown Updated documentation to include button device support, revised device category/platform lists, and clarified cover descriptions.

Sequence Diagram(s)

No sequence diagram generated as the changes are documentation-only and do not affect control flow or introduce new features in the codebase.
"""

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a8ef981 and dba8e8b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/wmspro.markdown (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • source/_integrations/wmspro.markdown

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed May 2, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
source/_integrations/wmspro.markdown (3)

35-35: Improve cross-reference formatting
Consider adding an Oxford comma for consistency in the list:

  • Current: [buttons](#buttons), [covers](#covers), [lights](#lights) and [scenes](#scenes)
  • Suggested: [buttons](#buttons), [covers](#covers), [lights](#lights), and [scenes](#scenes)

41-44: Add and document 'Buttons' section
Great to see the new "Buttons" section describing identification-capable devices. For consistency with Home Assistant style, consider adding a comma after "e.g." and clarifying punctuation:

- (e.g. winking an awning or blinking a light)
+ (e.g., winking an awning or blinking a light)

48-49: Clarify roller shutter/blind terminology
The phrase "roller shutters/blinds" could be clearer. Consider using "roller shutters and blinds" or "roller shutters or blinds" to avoid the slash notation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 59a34bd and a8ef981.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/wmspro.markdown (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
source/_integrations/wmspro.markdown (2)

5-5: Add 'Button' to ha_category metadata
Including "Button" in the Home Assistant category list aligns the documentation with the new platform support.

17-17: Include 'button' in ha_platforms
Registering "button" in the platforms list ensures that the new button entities are discoverable in the docs and UI.

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 added the awaits-parent Awaits the merge of an parent PR label May 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 left review comments

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
awaits-parent Awaits the merge of an parent PR has-parent This PR has a parent PR in a other repo next This PR goes into the next branch
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@mback2k @c0ffeeca7