Skip to content

Upgrade python packages in several devbox examples #2634

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2025

Conversation

loreto
Copy link
Contributor

@loreto loreto commented Jun 19, 2025

Summary

Upgrade python packages in several devbox examples

How was it tested?

N/A

Community Contribution License

All community contributions in this pull request are licensed to the project
maintainers under the terms of the
Apache 2 License.

By creating this pull request, I represent that I have the right to license the
contributions to the project maintainers under the Apache 2 License as stated in
the
Community Contribution License.

@loreto loreto requested review from mikeland73 and Copilot June 19, 2025 19:56
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR upgrades the Python interpreter reference for the Jupyter data science example to point at the appropriate virtual environment.

  • Adds a .pdm-python file to lock the interpreter path for the Jupyter example.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

examples/data_science/jupyter/.pdm-python:1

  • Committing an absolute, user-specific path can break portability for other developers. Consider using a relative path (e.g., ./.venv/bin/python) or documenting how to regenerate this file per environment.
/Users/daniel/Code/jetify/devbox/examples/data_science/jupyter/.venv/bin/python

@loreto loreto merged commit 1045205 into main Jun 19, 2025
33 checks passed
@loreto loreto deleted the daniel/upgrade-examples branch June 19, 2025 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants