Skip to content

[pyOpenSSL] version update #1431

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2018
Merged

Conversation

goffi-contrib
Copy link
Contributor

older version of pyOpenSSL was causing trouble ('module' object has no attribute 'OP_SINGLE_ECDH_USE'), updating it fixes it.
I didn't update to last version because OpenSSl and Cryptography are
outdated too, so this is a first step to have a working pyOpenSSL.

AndreMiras
AndreMiras previously approved these changes Oct 24, 2018
Copy link
Member

@AndreMiras AndreMiras left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @goffi-contrib
Until we merge your other linter pull request, do you mind adding W504 to the tox.ini ignore list so the build is green? This rule changed recently. So if your pull request could also ignore it for now that would be awesome.

older version of pyOpenSSL was causing trouble ('module' object has no attribute 'OP_SINGLE_ECDH_USE'), updating it fixes it.
I didn't update to last version because OpenSSl and Cryptography are
outdated too, so this is a first step to have a working pyOpenSSL.
@goffi-contrib
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AndreMiras sure, I've just updated the PR. Thanks for your quick feedbacks :)

@@ -18,4 +18,5 @@ ignore =
E123, E124, E126,
E226,
E402, E501, E722,
F812, F841, W503
F812, F841, W503,
W504
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For later reference; We ignored W504 because the rule of flake8==3.5.0 became the anti-pattern in flake8==3.6.0.

See https://github.com/LintlyCI/Flake8Rules/blob/ed09f9d/_rules/W503.md

Note: Despite being in the best practice section, this will soon be considered an anti-pattern.

@AndreMiras
Copy link
Member

Sweet, let's see if CI is happy and merge it then

Copy link
Member

@AndreMiras AndreMiras left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good thanks

@AndreMiras AndreMiras merged commit 65ee184 into kivy:master Oct 24, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants