Skip to content

apiserver: fix status code of future resourceVersion api request #131179

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

apiserver: fix status code of future resourceVersion api request #131179

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

RalXYZ
Copy link

@RalXYZ RalXYZ commented Apr 6, 2025 •
edited
Loading

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

In short, I discovered a reproducible bug in the Kubernetes REST API, identified the root cause, and implemented a fix. Additionally, I wrote a unit test to verify the resolution.

Steps to Reproduce Manually
  1. Start a Kubernetes cluster (I used the StartTestServer function from the testing package, but I believe the results would be the same with other methods).
  2. Send the following request (ensure the required credentials, such as tokens, are properly configured beforehand—omitted here for brevity):
curl -X GET "https://$IP:$PORT/apis/apps/v1/deployments?resourceVersion=2147483647&limit=1"

In other words, we send a GET request to /apis/apps/v1/deployments with a request parameter that includes an extremely large and obviously non-existent resourceVersion. Clearly, the server should return a 4xx error.

  1. However, the actual response is:
{
    "kind": "Status",
    "apiVersion": "v1",
    "metadata": {},
    "status": "Failure",
    "message": "etcdserver: mvcc: required revision is a future revision",
    "code": 500
}

This is unexpected. The request should be properly handled and return a 504 response instead of an Internal Server Error (500).

  1. Additionally, I observed a panic stack trace in the Kubernetes cluster logs.
Unit Test & Fix

To facilitate reproduction of the issue, I added a unit test. Running this test consistently reproduces the issue as described above.

After investigation, I found that the root cause of this issue lies in etcd's response to a non-existent high resourceVersion, which is etcdrpc.ErrFutureRev. However, this response is not properly handled in the Kubernetes API server. I applied the necessary fix in the source code, and after making the modification, the newly added unit test now behaves as expected.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

return 504 for "future" resource version in REST APIs

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Apr 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @RalXYZ. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. label Apr 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from aojea and wojtek-t April 6, 2025 08:35
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/apiserver area/test sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/etcd Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Etcd. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Apr 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: RalXYZ
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign liggitt for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test
/triage accepted

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Apr 8, 2025
@RalXYZ RalXYZ force-pushed the fix-unexpected-resp-code-3 branch from 37e93f8 to 0362e94 Compare April 9, 2025 06:10
@RalXYZ RalXYZ force-pushed the fix-unexpected-resp-code-3 branch from 0362e94 to 9f2b375 Compare April 9, 2025 06:41
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@RalXYZ: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only-parallel 9f2b375 link true /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only-parallel

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@RalXYZ RalXYZ changed the title apiserver: return 404 for future resourceVersion api request apiserver: fix status code of future resourceVersion api request Apr 9, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 8, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Aug 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@aojea aojea Awaiting requested review from aojea

@wojtek-t wojtek-t Awaiting requested review from wojtek-t

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/apiserver area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/etcd Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Etcd. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@RalXYZ @k8s-ci-robot @BenTheElder @k8s-triage-robot