Implement hasAll(), hasAny(), doesNotHave() and doesNotHaveAny() #26543
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
doesNotHave = |
|
I don't know you, but I'd rather write, and read,
than
|
|
No plan on adding at the moment. |
|
@taylorotwell Do you agree if I send |
This was referenced May 18, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Many time I had to check whether an item did not exist in a collection, and using the
!operator always seemed a bit less readable that it could be. So, I decided to implement thedoesNotHave()method.I have also implemented other useful, IMHO, methods to help:
hasAny()anddoesNotHaveAny().The current
has()method as been deprecated in favour ofhasAll()which is more in line to what it actually does.