Skip to content

slot|signal: static_assert not using R,T... syntax #100

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2023
Merged

slot|signal: static_assert not using R,T... syntax #100

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion sigc++/functors/slot.h
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -194,7 +194,9 @@ struct slot_call
*/
#ifndef DOXYGEN_SHOULD_SKIP_THIS
template<typename T_return, typename... T_arg>
class slot;
class slot final {
static_assert(sizeof...(T_arg) < 0, "The slot<R, T...> syntax has been removed. Use the slot<R(T...)> syntax.");
};
#endif // DOXYGEN_SHOULD_SKIP_THIS

template<typename T_return, typename... T_arg>
Expand Down
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion sigc++/signal.h
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -581,7 +581,9 @@ class signal_with_accumulator : public signal_base
*/
#ifndef DOXYGEN_SHOULD_SKIP_THIS
template<typename T_return, typename... T_arg>
class signal;
class signal final {
static_assert(sizeof...(T_arg) < 0, "The signal<R, T...> syntax has been removed. Use the signal<R(T...)> syntax.");
};
#endif // DOXYGEN_SHOULD_SKIP_THIS

template<typename T_return, typename... T_arg>
Expand Down