-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.9k
[libc++] Optimize __tree::find and __tree::__erase_unique #152370
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx Author: Nikolas Klauser (philnik777) Changes
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152370.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/libcxx/include/__tree b/libcxx/include/__tree
index 6ca1a623536f2..1a3d4afa2d8fc 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/__tree
+++ b/libcxx/include/__tree
@@ -2062,10 +2062,11 @@ template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
template <class _Key>
typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::size_type
__tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__erase_unique(const _Key& __k) {
- iterator __i = find(__k);
- if (__i == end())
+ __end_node_pointer __parent;
+ __node_base_pointer __i = __find_equal(__parent, __k);
+ if (__i == nullptr)
return 0;
- erase(__i);
+ erase(iterator(static_cast<__node_pointer>(__i)));
return 1;
}
|
03855dd
to
e774294
Compare
e774294
to
1995180
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with small comments
1995180
to
fc6edb7
Compare
fc6edb7
to
34e9a72
Compare
Should that go in the release notes as well? |
We have this function that tries to find all bookmark nodes with a given URL:
The whole thing as a standalone repro (the .sh is meant to run on a mac; needs minor tweaks to run on linux): From what I understand, our code is incorrect, and we should use e.g. (But, see question in the comment above please :)) |
Yes, this should probably be release noted. I'll make a patch.
Yeah, this looks incorrect to me. You want to either use |
This patch changes
__tree::find
to return when it has found any equal element instead of the lower bound of the equal elements. Formap
andset
there is no observable difference, since the keys are unique. However for theirmulti
versions this can mean a change in behaviour since it's not longer guaranteed thatfind
will return the first element.