I'd be willing to assist here as well @story645

Awesome! First we should see though if there's support from other maintainers or if other maintainers oppose this feature.

What does this do as the aspect ratio changes? The idea of an angle annotation seems pretty niche and fragile for the main library. Given our experience with arrows I'd be really really cautious about adding something half baked.

I very much have the same concerns as @jklymak. This seems complex and we should not add it if we're not confident that it's "just-works".

This is complex to get right. We won’t provide half-baked solutions. It’s niche and therefore we don’t send time on this. We would accept a PR if it addresses the above concerns.

@timhoffm why are you closing an issue where you say we'd accept a PR that addresses the concerns of the issue?

This is complex and niche. We should not be doing this and I very much doubt anybody es will. So it’s not worth keeping it open. IMO for an issue to stay open, we should either want this to be done (even though it may be hard and not happen for a long time) or it’s acceptable to be included and there’s a realistic chance that somebody else will meaningfully contribute. Otherwise we just pile up more and more open issues that are not relevant for the future development. Open issues are a curation of the direction of the library. If somebody wants to contribute, and looks for a topic that, they are the place to go. I wouldn’t recommend anybody to work on this, there are much more meaningful topics.

1200 open issues are not helpful. Either we close more aggressively according to my above criteria or we have to better structure and prioritize them #28834.

I left the note for the unlikely case that somebody stumbles over the issue and solves it because they need it so that they are not discouraged from bringing up the topic again.