-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
MNT: put back _hold
as read-only attribute on AxesBase
#12274
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This is to un-break the current version of cartopy.
attn @dopplershift |
basemap was able to manage this last year. See
matplotlib/basemap#328 and
matplotlib/basemap#334
…On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 2:06 PM Ryan May ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** approved this pull request.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#12274 (review)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARy-Jy68OWonQBhCeBiUx3vhemTS8YJks5uenC1gaJpZM4W5FGn>
.
|
The issue is that |
Should the attribute raise a deprecation warning? |
@eric-wieser I lean towards no, because there is nothing that users of the current version of cartopy can do about this and cartopy now knows about this and plans to get rid of it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is fine without a warning; I think it is generally understood that we are free to do whatever we want with "private" functions/methods/classes that have an underscore at the beginning, and that external libraries shouldn't be using them.
…ibute on AxesBase
…274-on-v3.0.x Backport PR #12274 on branch v3.0.x (MNT: put back `_hold` as read-only attribute on AxesBase)
So, how do we feel about putting back |
No, I am strongly opposed to putting back ishold(). |
This is to un-break the current version of cartopy.