Backport PR #12394 on branch v3.0.x (DOC: fix CL tutorial to give same output from saved file and example) #12412
Conversation
…t from saved file and example
|
I'll close this - I don't think it is urgent need of backporting. Sorry - I find the 3.0.0-doc branch confusing so I probably mis-milestoned... |
|
Oh yes, confusing indeed. I thought everything that concerns the current documentation should go in that branch, such that the online docs can be updated more frequently than library releases? |
|
I guess thats correct.... Sorry I hadn't realized you'd milestoned it. We can re-open. Doesn't hurt anything... |
|
Oh, but now I'm even more confused. This is a backport PR for the I think it would be helpful if someone could extend the branches and backports section a bit concerning this topic. |
|
That’s what confused me. But I think it’s right. We want future releases to have 3.0.0 changes. |
Backport PR #12394: DOC: fix CL tutorial to give same output from saved file and example