Make slowness warning for legend(loc="best") more accurate. #14894
+22
−15
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
... by actually timing the call duration. Locally I can best-locate
legends even with plots with hundreds of thousands of points basically
instantly, so the old warning was spurious.
The new test is obviously a bit brittle because it depends on how fast
the machine running it is. It's also slower than the test before
(intentionally, because now you actually need a slow-to-place legend
to trigger the warning).
The warning is only emitted after the legend has been placed, but that
seems fine -- if the best-placement is so slow that you ctrl-c the
process, you'll have a traceback anyways. Also, spawning a separate
thread to always emit the warning after exactly 5s will likely just make
things worse performance-wise on average.
The 5s delay is the same as used in font_manager.py.
The original warning went in as #12455.
PR Summary
PR Checklist