Skip to content

Added DNA Features Viewer description + screenshot in docs/thirdparty/ #16223

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

Zulko
Copy link
Contributor

@Zulko Zulko commented Jan 14, 2020

PR Summary

Added a section to docs/thirdpartypackages/index.rst to present DNA Features Viewer (DNA sequence map plots with Matplotlib), as per this Twitter discussion.

Screenshot:
dna_features_viewer_screenshot

PR Checklist

  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant

Copy link
Member

@timhoffm timhoffm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution. This looks really nice!

@Zulko
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zulko commented Jan 14, 2020

Done!

@anntzer
Copy link
Contributor

anntzer commented Jan 14, 2020

(As a tangent, writing a quick and dirty a plasmid viewer was at the origin of one of my first PRs to matplotlib: #1635 :-))

@Zulko
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zulko commented Jan 14, 2020

Nice! My library implements an ArrowWedge on top of your Wedge.

@timhoffm timhoffm added this to the v3.2.0 milestone Jan 14, 2020
@timhoffm timhoffm merged commit e8b2793 into matplotlib:master Jan 14, 2020
@timhoffm
Copy link
Member

Thanks a lot!

meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/matplotlib that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
tacaswell added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2020
…223-on-v3.2.x

Backport PR #16223 on branch v3.2.x (Added DNA Features Viewer description + screenshot in docs/thirdparty/)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants