Fix support for empty usetex strings. #16410
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Currently, `figtext(.5, .5, "%foo", usetex=True)` results in an obscure
exception (`FileNotFoundError: No such file or directory: blah.dvi`).
Fix that by forcing tex to always generate a page, by inserting at least
an empty \hbox{}.
|
Which PR is this waiting for? |
|
#16476 (sorry forgot to update the original text), but I guess I should combine both into a single PR for the usual image updating reasons. |
6 tasks
|
included into #16476 (as first commit) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently,
figtext(.5, .5, "%foo", usetex=True)results in an obscureexception (
FileNotFoundError: No such file or directory: blah.dvi).Fix that by forcing tex to always generate a page, by inserting at least
an empty \hbox{}.
Closes #16409.
Edit: looks like this shifts some tex strings a tiny bit, but I already have another patch which shifts them more -- specifically, a followup to #16373 which actually gives correct baselines even without using tex.latex.preview. So I'll just wait for that.
PR Summary
PR Checklist