-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
Unstale viewlims before draw()ing polar axes. #17422
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Confirmed regression from |
Also, that last Azure job was cancelled, but not reporting to GitHub, so I can't restart it. |
Restarted the job (side note, I don't understand the ACL model between GH and Azure). I am not sure I understand why this change fixes things, but 👍 . |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Anyone can merge on CI green.
Since you were wondering, this came from #13593, which made autoscaling lazy. The call to |
Owee, I'm MrMeeseeks, Look at me. There seem to be a conflict, please backport manually. Here are approximate instructions:
And apply the correct labels and milestones. Congratulation you did some good work ! Hopefully your backport PR will be tested by the continuous integration and merged soon! If these instruction are inaccurate, feel free to suggest an improvement. |
Ah, that makes sense. |
Unstale viewlims before draw()ing polar axes. Conflicts: lib/matplotlib/projections/polar.py - conflicts from nearyby changes to signature of draw lib/matplotlib/tests/test_polar.py - tests are still in test_axes.py on v3.2.x
… axes. Merge pull request matplotlib#17422 from anntzer/polarunstale Unstale viewlims before draw()ing polar axes. Conflicts: lib/matplotlib/projections/polar.py - conflicts from nearyby changes to signature of draw lib/matplotlib/tests/test_polar.py - tests are still in test_axes.py on v3.2.x
…-v3.2.x Backport PR #17422: Unstale viewlims before draw()ing polar axes.
PR Summary
Closes #17418 (likely a regression in 3.2).
PR Checklist