-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
Add __version_info__ as a tuple-based version identifier #18869
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
Version information | ||
------------------- | ||
We switched to the `release-branch-semver`_ version scheme. This only affects, | ||
the version information for development builds. Their version number now | ||
describes the targeted release, i.e. 3.5.0.dev820+g6768ef8c4c.d20210520 | ||
is 820 commits after the previous release and is scheduled to be officially | ||
released as 3.5.0 later. | ||
|
||
In addition to the string ``__version__``, there is now a namedtuple | ||
``__version_info__`` as well, which is modelled after `sys.version_info`_. | ||
Its primary use is safely comparing version information, e.g. | ||
``if __version_info__ >= (3, 4, 2)``. | ||
|
||
.. _release-branch-semver: https://github.com/pypa/setuptools_scm#version-number-construction | ||
.. _sys.version_info: https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.version_info |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would do
return globals()[name]
as that seems more robust if we ever want to add more entries to the module-level__getattr__
, but I'm not going to block over that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll leave this as is because explicit is better and still simple enough for two cases. We can (and should) switch to your proposal if we add more entries.