Skip to content

Remove incorrect statement about hist(..., log=True). #19079

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2020

Conversation

anntzer
Copy link
Contributor

@anntzer anntzer commented Dec 7, 2020

We don't remove zero-count patches, as can easily be checked with e.g.
print(hist([0, 0, 0, 10], 10, log=True)). The incorrect statement
came in in f24d06c, but it is clear that that patch did not implement
that behavior, instead filtering out such patches in
_update_patch_limits.

PR Summary

PR Checklist

  • Has pytest style unit tests (and pytest passes).
  • Is Flake 8 compliant (run flake8 on changed files to check).
  • New features are documented, with examples if plot related.
  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant (the docs should build without error).
  • Conforms to Matplotlib style conventions (install flake8-docstrings and run flake8 --docstring-convention=all).
  • New features have an entry in doc/users/next_whats_new/ (follow instructions in README.rst there).
  • API changes documented in doc/api/next_api_changes/ (follow instructions in README.rst there).

We don't remove zero-count patches, as can easily be checked with e.g.
`print(hist([0, 0, 0, 10], 10, log=True))`.  The incorrect statement
came in in f24d06c, but it is clear that that patch did not implement
that behavior, instead filtering out such patches in
`_update_patch_limits`.
@QuLogic QuLogic added this to the v3.4.0 milestone Dec 8, 2020
@QuLogic QuLogic merged commit c1e0211 into matplotlib:master Dec 8, 2020
@anntzer anntzer deleted the hl branch December 8, 2020 07:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants