Skip to content

Wrong text baseline with usetex. #2015

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 16, 2013

Conversation

mdboom
Copy link
Member

@mdboom mdboom commented May 15, 2013

With current master, examples/pylab_examples/usetex_baseline_test.py produces the following image. And the baseline is wrong when usetex is used.

figure_1

It used to work fine and it still does in v1.2.x.

http://matplotlib.org/examples/pylab_examples/usetex_baseline_test.html

Any clue what changed this?

@mdboom
Copy link
Member

mdboom commented May 15, 2013

Probably #1810, which changed how baselines are handled. I'll look into it.

@ghost ghost assigned mdboom May 15, 2013
… baseline handling was broken for text.usetex = True. This brings it inline with everything else (where the assumption is that y == 0 is the baseline and not the bottom).
@mdboom
Copy link
Member

mdboom commented May 15, 2013

@leejjoon: I think this should do it.

[Background: #1810 changed things so the backends were passed the location of the baseline, rather than the bottom, of the text for draw_text. This is much more natural for most backends (other than Agg) and simplified a number of things. This just brings the draw_tex methods inline with that.]

@leejjoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks! This fixes the problem.

mdboom added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2013
@mdboom mdboom merged commit 4ed18ca into matplotlib:master May 16, 2013
@mdboom mdboom deleted the usetex-baseline-fixes branch August 7, 2014 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants