-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
ENH: switch mpl_toolkits to implicit namespace package (PEP 420) #25381
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
``matplotlib.mpl_toolkits`` is now an implicit namespace package | ||
---------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
|
||
Following the deprecation of ``pkg_resources.declare_namespace`` in ``setuptools`` 67.3.0, | ||
``matplotlib.mpl_toolkits`` is now implemented as an implicit namespace, following | ||
`PEP 420 <https://peps.python.org/pep-0420/>`_. |
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure I read https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/userguide/package_discovery.html#finding-simple-packages correctly, but could we use
find_packages(…, include=..)
? The exclude has the danger of unintentionally picking up other files we add in the future.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I experimented a bit with it and so far I haven't been able to build matplotlib by supplying
include
instead ofexclude
. Even building an exhaustive list of all modules that should be included doesn't appear to work. I don't know if that's a bug in setuptools or if there's something I don't understand about this function.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the key difference between
include
andexclude
are a) liklihood of adding things that we want to go in each list. and b) ease of drawing the lines around the things we want included/excluded.for a), I think it is more likely that we add python modules than folders we wish to exclude from being importable python modules (both could happen, but I'd expect python modules to be more common), so excludes are less likely to be updated
for b) I think that the things excluded appear directly next to things that want to be included, so I think it is much easier to specify exclusions.
I mean, it is just a list of strings at the end of the day, so if there is an easier way to produce the list we want, I'm not opposed, but lean towards using the tools provided to produce the lists.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will change under meson so lets not over think this.