-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
Emit xlim_changed on shared axes. #26011
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -1241,11 +1241,13 @@ def _set_lim(self, v0, v1, *, emit=True, auto): | |||||||
self.axes.callbacks.process(f"{name}lim_changed", self.axes) | ||||||||
# Call all of the other axes that are shared with this one | ||||||||
for other in self._get_shared_axes(): | ||||||||
if other is not self.axes: | ||||||||
other._axis_map[name]._set_lim( | ||||||||
v0, v1, emit=False, auto=auto) | ||||||||
if other.figure != self.figure: | ||||||||
other.figure.canvas.draw_idle() | ||||||||
if other is self.axes: | ||||||||
continue | ||||||||
other._axis_map[name]._set_lim(v0, v1, emit=False, auto=auto) | ||||||||
if emit: | ||||||||
other.callbacks.process(f"{name}lim_changed", other) | ||||||||
Comment on lines
+1247
to
+1248
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
This if will never be false as it is guarded by the same There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. True, but I think guarding the shared-axes syncing with There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I was wondering a bit about that behavior, but didn't take the time to actually test it... Could it be as simple as dedenting the for loop (and keeping this if)? That would:
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Dedenting the for loop will lead to infinite recursion, so that will need some kind of marker to block recursion (but it can't be done by overloading the semantics of emit as I proposed initially...). |
||||||||
if other.figure != self.figure: | ||||||||
other.figure.canvas.draw_idle() | ||||||||
|
||||||||
self.stale = True | ||||||||
return v0, v1 | ||||||||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could this just be solved with the one line change of:
inside of this for loop/if condition
seems overdesigned to introduce undocumented sentinel behavior to get one line to run.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yes, that's much better.