Make functions
param to secondary_x/yaxis not keyword-only.
#28133
+5
−5
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I suspect the parameter was made keyword-only because the originally planned signature (#11859) was
secondary_xaxis(location, forward=..., inverse=...)
where the keywords actually add some semantics (though that signature overall seems worse); however, for a singlefunctions
parameter, having to type an extrafunctions=
in the call doesn't help the reader much (either they know what secondary_x/yaxis does, in which case the explicit kwarg doesn't matter, or they don't, in which case the kwarg name hardly helps)... and is a bit annoying. See the modified gallery entry, for example.PR summary
PR checklist