-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
remove mention to %pylab [backport to 1.4.2-doc] #3743
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Looks good to me, I will deal with this later to do the cherry-picking. |
===================== | ||
|
||
.. note:: | ||
|
||
The mode described here still exist for historical reason, but it is highly |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"exist" -> "exists", "reason" -> "reasons"
Fixed typo and add link to IPython doc for matplotlib support. Thanks ! |
DOC : remove mention to %pylab
DOC : remove mention to %pylab
Cherry-picked to v1.4.2-doc as eb001d1 |
Thanks, I apparently received "primecoins" for that. |
No and I think it introduces a perverse set of incentives. Reports are that primecoin is a new crypto-currency trying to get a foot hold by donating to committers to OSS projects. See the discussion at scikit-image/scikit-image#1199. |
Ok, thanks for the link. I was feeling it was something along that indeed. I also feel like commit might not be the right granularity, and can understand the problems. I hope it will still add dynamism to some project. |
Remove references of %pylab and/or warn not to use.
In image tutorial it was completely unused later. And of course people on Stack Overflow
always appear to be able to find the most deeply buried documentation to give bad advices.