-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
Fix unpickling/__setstate__ in TransformNode #4070
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you explain why this changes anything?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The weak reference is destroyed during pickling, thus
self._parents
does not exist anymore at this point.__getstate__
however saved it indata_dict['_parents']
from which it is now restored.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is doing what you thing it is. Previously we were restoring the _parents from the stored data dictionary, now this is restoring parents from self, which hasn't yet been initialised. Hence, _parents will simply be empty (https://github.com/joergdietrich/matplotlib/blob/%234068/lib/matplotlib/transforms.py#L97).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Scrap that. I think I'm talking rubbish. (Friday afternoon!)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you've found a bug with the setstate implementation, and I don't think it has previously been tested correctly.
How about simply doing
data_dict['_parents']
though. It may be more clear what is going on that way.Would you also mind adding a test that
self._parents
actually is accessible after being restored?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still don't understand... shouldn't
self._parents
be equivalent toself.__dict__['_parents']
, since the object dictionary would be where oneaccesses attributes of the object?
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Phil Elson notifications@github.com
wrote: